2002
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Nonfocused Helical CT for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A 5-Year Review

Abstract: Nonfocused helical CT was highly accurate in diagnosing acute appendicitis or suggesting an alternative diagnosis in patients with acute lower abdominal pain or right lower quadrant pain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
71
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 Abdominal contrast-enhanced spiral CT is considered the criterion standard for diagnosis of AA. 17 None of the 11 patients with AA in our series underwent CT, and only 38 of the 169 remaining patients were studied with CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…16 Abdominal contrast-enhanced spiral CT is considered the criterion standard for diagnosis of AA. 17 None of the 11 patients with AA in our series underwent CT, and only 38 of the 169 remaining patients were studied with CT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, CT has been accepted as superior to US in the diagnosis of appendicitis, with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and lower normal-appendix removal. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT imaging were reported as 93-100%, 85-99%, and 94-97.6%, respectively, with higher ratios in men compared to women [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional imaging techniques, including ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and more recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been successfully used to examine patients suspected to have appendicitis [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Because of technical improvements, US has been reported to reach sensitivities and specificities of up to 98% for diagnosis of acute appendicitis, a rate highly dependent on the experience of the sonographer [5,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) The usefulness of high frequency probe and graded compression method has a high diagnostic value for acute appendicitis. (4,5) Superiority of Computed tomography compared to Ultrasonography is overemphasised by many studies (6,7,8,9,10,11) possibly because ultrasonography instrumentation was not very well developed at that time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%