2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the mid-trimester ultrasound scan in the detection of fetal congenital anomalies in a reference center in Northeastern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Akinmoladun et al 12 report a 93.5% specificity of prenatal ultrasound anomaly screening program. Leiroz et al 13 in a similar study report sensitivity and specificity of the scan to be 61.1% and 96.3%, respectively. These data suggest a good specificity but fair sensitivity.Hu et al 9 also suggest that 5% of CNS anomalies are missed even after routine ultrasound scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Akinmoladun et al 12 report a 93.5% specificity of prenatal ultrasound anomaly screening program. Leiroz et al 13 in a similar study report sensitivity and specificity of the scan to be 61.1% and 96.3%, respectively. These data suggest a good specificity but fair sensitivity.Hu et al 9 also suggest that 5% of CNS anomalies are missed even after routine ultrasound scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As shown in previous studies, the detection rate of foetal malformations in the first trimester can reach more than 60% [ 34 ], with a high positive predictive value (94.7%), and a high negative predictive value (98.7%) [ 35 ]. Compared with the records following pregnancy termination, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the mid-trimester ultrasound screening for congenital malformation detection were 61.1%, 96.3%, and 94.3%, respectively [ 36 ]. The detection rate can be as high as 81.4% before the third trimester [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%