2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2020.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy, recording interference, and articulatory quality of headsets for ultrasound recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are some data to suggest that standard-sized US equipment may provide reliable and valid swallowing measures [ 5 , 12 , 16 ], this could not be confirmed for pocket-sized technology [ 24 , 60 ]. The method of data acquisition, such as the use of hand-held versus fixed transducers, may further affect reliability [ 61 , 62 ]; as might variability between different data collection settings, for example, data collected in the clinical versus research environment. The relationships between reliability, validity and the assessment protocol are reciprocal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are some data to suggest that standard-sized US equipment may provide reliable and valid swallowing measures [ 5 , 12 , 16 ], this could not be confirmed for pocket-sized technology [ 24 , 60 ]. The method of data acquisition, such as the use of hand-held versus fixed transducers, may further affect reliability [ 61 , 62 ]; as might variability between different data collection settings, for example, data collected in the clinical versus research environment. The relationships between reliability, validity and the assessment protocol are reciprocal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons between the lightweight plastic headset used for the cleft dataset and the metal version, show them to be similar. 25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A probe stabilization headset (UltraFit, Articulate Instruments) (Pucher et al., 2020) was fitted to each participant to maintain the probe in the midsagittal plane and reduce movement relative to the head (Figure 1). This minimizes the potential inconsistency in hyoid measurements between different frames resulting from probe or head movement rather than the actual movement of the structure of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%