2008
DOI: 10.1097/tp.0b013e3181875959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate and Reasonable Method for Estimation of Graft Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct estimation of graft weight from graft volume was based on the assumption that the liver has the same density as water 19 , 20 ; however, the density of the liver is slightly higher than that of water 21 . Thus, graft weight directly estimated from graft volume tended to be larger than actual graft weight measured intraoperatively 15 , 17 , 22 26 . The indirect formulas converting graft volume to graft weight can be classified into two groups; one with blood volume included in graft volume 15 , 16 and the other with blood volume excluded from graft volume 1 , 14 , 17 , 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Direct estimation of graft weight from graft volume was based on the assumption that the liver has the same density as water 19 , 20 ; however, the density of the liver is slightly higher than that of water 21 . Thus, graft weight directly estimated from graft volume tended to be larger than actual graft weight measured intraoperatively 15 , 17 , 22 26 . The indirect formulas converting graft volume to graft weight can be classified into two groups; one with blood volume included in graft volume 15 , 16 and the other with blood volume excluded from graft volume 1 , 14 , 17 , 18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This distinction can lead to a large difference between the CT-calculated volume of the RLL and the actual weight of the RLL at the time of surgical resection. Other causes for the differences between the CT-calculated volume and the intraoperative weight include accuracy of the CT cuts, arterial and venous pressures, variation in CT image quality due to patient respiration, radiologist expertise, the fact that intraoperative measurements of the liver are taken without blood (which is considered to have a density of 1.00 g/ml), and variations in the location of the MHV division [21,[36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1985 yılında Van Thiel ve arkadaşları klasik olarak BT ile ölçülen 1 mL karaciğer hacminin 1 gr karaciğer ağırlığına eşit olduğunu kabul etmişti (25). Ancak daha sonra çeşitli araştırmalarda cc olarak ölçülen preoperatif TGV'nin gram olarak ölçülen GGA'dan daha büyük olduğunu ve bu ikili arasında ±%5 ile ±%36 arasında yanılma payının olabileceği bildirilmiştir (10,13,(26)(27)(28)(29). Bu yanılma payının intraoperatif kanın drenajı, anatomik varyasyon, interobserver varyasyon ve BT cihazı varyasyonu gibi çeşitli nedenleri olduğu düşünülmüştür.…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified