2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-60337-3_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Autonomous UAV Landing Using Vision-Based Detection of ArUco-Marker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first category of approaches, markers are detected based on their appearance or geometry using traditional image features, and then the relative pose of the UAV is computed from these extracted feature points. Over the years, several types of markers have been proposed for this purpose including point markers [3,4], circle markers [5], H-shaped markers [6,7], square markers [8] and ArUco markers [9,13]. These approaches require the landing site to be predestined and are not employable in unstructured or unfamiliar environments.…”
Section: Landing On a Known Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first category of approaches, markers are detected based on their appearance or geometry using traditional image features, and then the relative pose of the UAV is computed from these extracted feature points. Over the years, several types of markers have been proposed for this purpose including point markers [3,4], circle markers [5], H-shaped markers [6,7], square markers [8] and ArUco markers [9,13]. These approaches require the landing site to be predestined and are not employable in unstructured or unfamiliar environments.…”
Section: Landing On a Known Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lebedev et al [13] presents a combination of two algorithms for on-image search and accurate landing on an ArUco marker. When the marker appears in the acquired image, it's characteristics are revealed and the algorithm estimates the orientation and position of the marker and the distance from the observing vehicle.…”
Section: Landing On a Known Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When virtual markers are not available, physical markers are employed [22], [23], and among them, the ArUco marker library (ArUco -Augmented Reality University of Cordoba) was found to be one of the most effective and robust to detection errors and occlusion [24]- [26]. Elangovan et al [27] used them for decoding contact forces exerted by adaptive hands, while Sani and Karamian [28] and Lebedev et al [29] employed them for drone quadrotor and UAV autonomous navigation and landing, respectively. In relation to the use of fiducial markers for vibrations measurement, Abdelbarr et al [30] researched structural 3D displacement using ArUco markers, while the study of Kalybek et al [31] provides one of the first evidence of the capability of optical vibration monitoring systems in modal identifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding pattern recognition landing systems, works such as [13,14], among others [15][16][17][18], focus on finding the position using known patterns by Perspective-n-Point (PnP) algorithms [19]. Patterns such as Aruco [20], charuco, or new fractal patterns such as [21] or the deep learning trend You Only Look Once (YOLO) [22] try to improve the pattern pose estimation and prove to be widespread systems in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%