2015
DOI: 10.1364/ao.54.007718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate estimation of the backscattering coefficient by light scattering at two backward angles

Abstract: Backscattering coefficients are frequently estimated from light scattering at one backward angle multiplied by a conversion factor. We determined that the shapes of the volume scattering functions (VSFs), particularly for scattering angles larger than 170°, cause significant variations in the conversion factor at 120°. Our approach uses the ratio of scattering at 170° and at 120°, which is a good indicator of the shape differences of the VSFs for most oceanic waters and wavelengths in the visible range. The pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the point of intersection of these end members is at angles around 120°, the affine combination of these end members also intersect at the approximately the same angle, which explains why the backward shapes of VSFs by natural particles exhibit minimal variability at ~120°. Tan et al [29] showed recently that the ratio of scattering at 170° and 120° is a good indicator of the shape differences of the VSFs measured for natural particles as well as for cultures of phytoplankton. This finding can be easily derived from Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the point of intersection of these end members is at angles around 120°, the affine combination of these end members also intersect at the approximately the same angle, which explains why the backward shapes of VSFs by natural particles exhibit minimal variability at ~120°. Tan et al [29] showed recently that the ratio of scattering at 170° and 120° is a good indicator of the shape differences of the VSFs measured for natural particles as well as for cultures of phytoplankton. This finding can be easily derived from Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PT specific absorption properties are available but large spectral variability is related to algal culturing and variations in size, pigment composition and pigment packaging due to physiological responses of PT. In contrast, due to high measuring uncertainties spectral scattering properties (including back-scattering and volume scattering function) are still less known (Tan et al, 2015;Harmel et al, 2016). Thus, PG related specific IOPs are not adequately represented in RTMs.…”
Section: Gap 2: Lack Of Traceability Of Uncertainties In Pg Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, spectral scattering properties of natural waters are not well characterised [85,86], and phytoplankton spectral backscattering characteristics are underexploited in terms of their impact on the water-leaving signal. The importance of better representing the angular and spectrally variable nature of phytoplankton scattering has been established [35], and it is clear that phytoplankton backscatter is at the heart of the PFT question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%