1996
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/29/22/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate multichannel continuum states by a general configuration interaction expansion in aB-spline basis: application to He photoionization

Abstract: We report theoretical calculations of the total and partial cross section and asymmetry parameter for He photoionization up to the N = 3 threshold. Multichannel continuum wavefunctions are obtained via a least squares solution of the Schrödinger equation employing a basis set expansion based on a primitive B-spline radial basis and a general configuration interaction form. This allows use of a mixed full CI and close-coupling expansion in a completely general approach to improve correlation description in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
48
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
11
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the more recent calculation by Moccia and Spizzo [67] data by Lindle et al [86]. The present two complementary methods (PSS and Berkeley-ECS) agree, within the graphical resolution, perfectly with each other and with the calculation of Moccia and Spizzo [67] and also of Venuti et al [74]. Thus, it appears that the measurements of the β 2 parameter by Lindle et al between the N = 2 and N = 3 thresholds are consistent with theory.…”
Section: A Photoionization Spectrum Below the Double-ionization Thresupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, the more recent calculation by Moccia and Spizzo [67] data by Lindle et al [86]. The present two complementary methods (PSS and Berkeley-ECS) agree, within the graphical resolution, perfectly with each other and with the calculation of Moccia and Spizzo [67] and also of Venuti et al [74]. Thus, it appears that the measurements of the β 2 parameter by Lindle et al between the N = 2 and N = 3 thresholds are consistent with theory.…”
Section: A Photoionization Spectrum Below the Double-ionization Thresupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Today several efficient methods capable of computing multielectron single-ionization scattering states are available. They include the R-matrix [69], J -matrix [70], K-matrix [71,72], Feshbach projection [73], and inverse iteration [74]. Furthermore, the computational overhead for generating scattering states is easily compensated whenever a large number of different simulations must be carried out, as is the case, e.g., of time-delay scans in pump-probe schemes.…”
Section: B Projection Onto Exact Scattering Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complete the calculation procedure we need to solve the eigenvalue equations for the electronic potentials E g (R) and E u (R) we follow an approach where the system is placed in a spherical box which effectively discretizes the continuum spectrum, a method that has been applied with success in both complex atomic and molecular systems [29,[34][35][36][37][38]. The nuclear eigenstates are then expressed in terms of known B-splines polynomials which, after imposing zero boundary condition at both edges of the spherical box, transforms the problem to a matrix generalized eigenvalue problem, which, by now, can be solved using standard numerical approaches.…”
Section: A Calculational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Burke and McVicar's calculation [7] in 1965, resonance states other than the normally known plus-minus series appeared. Sequently, atomic theoreticians developed various methods to deal with doubly excited states of helium, including configuration-interaction (CI) methods [56][57][58][59][60], hyperspherical coordinate methods [9,[61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74], close-coupling approximations [7,75,76], R-matrix methods [77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84], complex coordinate method [85][86][87][88][89][90], saddle-point technique [91][92][93][94][95], Feshbach projection formalism [8,[96][97][98]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%