2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-017-1505-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate prediction of complex free surface flow around a high speed craft using a single-phase level set method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation campaign first involves comparison of global quantities with experimental data usually coming from towing tank tests. The most important global quantities which are analyzed when dealing with 2 DoF setups are typically the total drag, the pitch angle, and the sinkage [14]. Besides, more detailed physics elements -e.g., wave patterns, pressure distributions, wetted surface -are taken into consideration to assess the quality of the solutions.…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validation campaign first involves comparison of global quantities with experimental data usually coming from towing tank tests. The most important global quantities which are analyzed when dealing with 2 DoF setups are typically the total drag, the pitch angle, and the sinkage [14]. Besides, more detailed physics elements -e.g., wave patterns, pressure distributions, wetted surface -are taken into consideration to assess the quality of the solutions.…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As concerns the trim angle, the differences are still small but a bit higher. It is well known that a perfect reproduction of trim angles is challenging [14] and, in our case, the differences can be related to the direction of the towing force which creates an additional pitching moment not considered in the current LincoSim setup.…”
Section: Validation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrodynamic resistance was evaluated by an adaptive multi-fidelity SRBF metamodel [52] trained with high-fidelity URANS (χnavis [53]) and low-fidelity potential flow (WARP [54]) solvers. Further details on design variables, objective functions, constraints, and conditions can be found in [51].…”
Section: Swath Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main characteristics of the solver are reported here; for more details and some applications, the reader is referred to Refs. [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Test Conditions and Submissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the model has been also demonstrated to be rather dissipative, special attention must be posed in generating the computational mesh, especially where high velocity gradients are expected. The free surface effects are simulated through a fully nonlinear level-set (LS) single phase methodology [29,33]. The numerical mesh employed is based on "chimera" grid technique.…”
Section: Test Conditions and Submissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%