2017
DOI: 10.1002/pc.24277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate predictions of orientation dependent modulus in short‐fiber‐reinforced composite with experimental validation

Abstract: Predictions of fiber orientation dependent mechanical properties are extremely important in the automotive industry for injection molded fiber‐reinforced thermoplastic composites. Prior studies on three‐dimensional (3D) numerical computations have not had satisfactory results in the searches for significant deviation in the core region and skin boundary of a fiber orientation pattern, although the orientation in the shell layer was predicted fairly well. To perform the connection between fiber orientation and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the RSC model is difficult to apply in practice because it is strongly influenced by the variable numerical values of inlet conditions 33 . Recently, in regard to this issue, Tseng et al 34,35 proposed a new model, called the improved anisotropic rotary diffusion and retarding principal rate (iARD‐RPR), which was experimentally verified to accurately predict the orientation distribution of short fibers in melts. The expression of the model is as follows: trueA˙=A˙HD+A˙iARD(),CICM+A˙PRP()α A˙HD=()WAAW+ξ()DA+AD2A4:D W=1/2()LLT D=1/2()L+LT A˙iARD=trueγ˙[]2Dr2italictr()Dr5DrA5ADr+10A4:Dr Dr=CI()normalICMD2D2 …”
Section: Numerical Simulation Theory Of Waim Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the RSC model is difficult to apply in practice because it is strongly influenced by the variable numerical values of inlet conditions 33 . Recently, in regard to this issue, Tseng et al 34,35 proposed a new model, called the improved anisotropic rotary diffusion and retarding principal rate (iARD‐RPR), which was experimentally verified to accurately predict the orientation distribution of short fibers in melts. The expression of the model is as follows: trueA˙=A˙HD+A˙iARD(),CICM+A˙PRP()α A˙HD=()WAAW+ξ()DA+AD2A4:D W=1/2()LLT D=1/2()L+LT A˙iARD=trueγ˙[]2Dr2italictr()Dr5DrA5ADr+10A4:Dr Dr=CI()normalICMD2D2 …”
Section: Numerical Simulation Theory Of Waim Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 The iARD-RPR model can restore the standard Folgar–Tucker model, while the RPR model 13 has been demonstrated to be identical to the RSC model. The iARD-RPR model has been useful not only for predicting the skin–shell–core structure, but also in discussing the core width with respect to operation conditions, 14 mold geometries, 14 long/short fibers, 15 carbon/glass fibers, 15 and low/high fiber concentration, 16 as well as effect of the packing stage on fiber orientation. 17 The iARD-RPR model’s application value for allowing good orientation predictions has been virtually authenticated in the long carbon-fiber composite project of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the RSC model is hard to be applied to the practical application of numerical simulation, because of the difficulty of deriving its reliable inlet conditions when handling complex geometries 38 . Recently, Tseng et al 28,38 developed a new model, namely Improved ARD and Retarding Principal Rate (iARD‐RPR) model, which proved that the numerical prediction of short fiber orientation obtained by this model was quite consistent with the experimental results. In this work, the iARD‐RPR model was adopted, and its expression is as below: Agoodbreak=AHDgoodbreak+AiARD(),CICMgoodbreak+APRP()α AHDgoodbreak=()WAgoodbreak−AWgoodbreak+ξ()DAgoodbreak+ADgoodbreak−2A4:D Wgoodbreak=1/2()Lgoodbreak−LT Dgoodbreak=1/2()Lgoodbreak+LT AiARDgoodbreak=γ[]2Drgoodbreak−2italictr()Drgoodbreak−5DrAgoodbreak−5ADrgoodbreak+10A4:Dr Drgoodbreak=CI()normalICMD2D2 …”
Section: Theoretical Partmentioning
confidence: 75%