2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30695-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Sample Time Reconstruction for Sensor Data Synchronization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the influence of communication jitter on the measured amount of relative clock drift between the host and the sensor devices is reduced by using low-pass filter mechanisms. To prove our simulated findings in [ 1 ], we performed experiments with real sensors and improved the metric for a better comparability of the results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the influence of communication jitter on the measured amount of relative clock drift between the host and the sensor devices is reduced by using low-pass filter mechanisms. To prove our simulated findings in [ 1 ], we performed experiments with real sensors and improved the metric for a better comparability of the results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hence, the approach includes the reconstruction of the single sensor samples from the FIFO stream as well as their drift and offset corrected sampling time stamps. In addition to our previous work in [ 1 ], the ASTR is refined by considering the bandwidth of different underlying communication systems in order to compensate timing offset errors between multiple sensor devices. Furthermore, the influence of communication jitter on the measured amount of relative clock drift between the host and the sensor devices is reduced by using low-pass filter mechanisms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, when trying to use data collected from multiple sensors for location estimation (and activity recognition), a noticeable problem is sensor synchronization: most of the time, the clocks of the emitting sensors and devices involved are not completely synchronized. The approach proposed in [ 17 ] assumes that multiple sensors—each with its own clock and all connected to a single host—collect their timestamped observations in a FIFO (First-In-First-Out) structure; the host fetches the sensor data and performs a reconstruction of the sensor sample times, assuming a constant drift for each sensor and deterministic communication times. In our work, synchronization is not explicitly solved at the data-collection step; instead, we introduce the concept of a time “window” which abstracts the timestamp units at a coarser granularity and allows our method to ignore the imperfect synchronization of the data sources/sensors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will evaluate, which sensor synchronisation techniques are applicable in our scenario, regarding accuracy of the synchronisation and the delays caused by such synchronisation techniques. A possible approach would be the timestamp reconstruction described in [15], performed centrally on the host platform.…”
Section: Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%