2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurately measuring the ionic conductivity of membranes via the direct contact method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better understand the role of CuHCF deposited at the CEM surface, the degree of ion transport under an electric field (i.e., electromigration) was quantified by EIS in the absence and presence of individual layers to isolate each contribution (Figure c; also see Figure S9 for representative Nyquist plots). The use of EIS allowed for extracting the membrane resistance from the overall membrane resistance involving the double layer and diffusional boundary layer. The resistance of CuHCF-CEM was relatively low in NH 4 Cl (4.3 ± 0.3 Ω cm 2 ) compared to NaCl (5.7 ± 0.1 Ω cm 2 ). The CuHCF layer contributed less resistance to the overall membrane resistance in NH 4 + (1.2 ± 0.2 Ω cm 2 ) than in Na + (1.8 ± 0.1 Ω cm 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better understand the role of CuHCF deposited at the CEM surface, the degree of ion transport under an electric field (i.e., electromigration) was quantified by EIS in the absence and presence of individual layers to isolate each contribution (Figure c; also see Figure S9 for representative Nyquist plots). The use of EIS allowed for extracting the membrane resistance from the overall membrane resistance involving the double layer and diffusional boundary layer. The resistance of CuHCF-CEM was relatively low in NH 4 Cl (4.3 ± 0.3 Ω cm 2 ) compared to NaCl (5.7 ± 0.1 Ω cm 2 ). The CuHCF layer contributed less resistance to the overall membrane resistance in NH 4 + (1.2 ± 0.2 Ω cm 2 ) than in Na + (1.8 ± 0.1 Ω cm 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, potential complications of co-ions in the membrane, which are present when the membrane is equilibrated with an electrolyte solution, are eliminated. Furthermore, by establishing direct contact between the membrane and electrodes, effects associated with ion partitioning at the membrane-solution interface are removed, provided that interfacial resistances between the membrane and electrodes are properly accounted for . That is, experiments performed with the direct contact method directly probe ion migration within the membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionic conductivity of DI water-equilibrated membranes was measured via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy using the “direct contact” method. , In this method, the membrane is compressed between two electrodes during the measurements. The direct contact method has several advantages over the alternative method that implements an electrolyte solution between the membrane and electrodes (i.e., “difference” method).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentiostatic EIS was used to determine the ionic conductivity of the CEM. For the virgin CEM and each used CEM, four samples were cut slightly larger than the circular electrode (2 cm diameter) in the sample holder and equilibrated with 0.1 M NaCl solution overnight prior to measurement. Stacks consisting of 1, 2, and 3 samples were placed into a sample holder (BioLogic CESH-e, Seyssinet-Pariset, France) and compressed to allow through-plane measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%