2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Breast Cancer Surgery in a Single Setting With Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis of the Sentinel Lymph Node

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researches still recommend intraoperative assessment of SNs. For clinical node negative breast cancer, intraoperative frozen section has a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 100%, and a patient recall rate of 3% [15]. Risk factors of FNSN include tumor location, lymphovascular invasion, suspicious node in preoperative study, less than three SNs, invasive lobular carcinoma, and poorly-differentiated cancer [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other researches still recommend intraoperative assessment of SNs. For clinical node negative breast cancer, intraoperative frozen section has a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 100%, and a patient recall rate of 3% [15]. Risk factors of FNSN include tumor location, lymphovascular invasion, suspicious node in preoperative study, less than three SNs, invasive lobular carcinoma, and poorly-differentiated cancer [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraoperative frozen section of SNs has a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 100%. Estimated 3% patients are recalled for ALND due to a false negative result of frozen section during the first operation [15]. Number of SNs is also a confounding factor of false negative results of SLNB and harvesting only one sentinel node contributes higher rate of axillary recurrence [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Несмотря на эти недостатки, метод фиксации срезов путем замораживания часто является более предпочтительным для интраоперационной оценки СЛУ. Чувствительность данного метода составляет 52-93%, а специфичность 98.5-100% [15][16]. Мета-анализ 47 исследований замороженных срезов СЛУ, показал общую чувствительность как 73%, с более высокой чувствительностью для макрометастазов, чем для микрометастазов (94% против 40%) [17].…”
Section: интраоперационная оценка сигнальных лимфатических узлов (слу)unclassified
“…Despite these disadvantages, FS is often the preferred method for IOE of most histopathologists. The sensitivity of SLN FS is 52–93%, and the specificity is 98.5–100% . A meta‐analysis, including 47 FS studies, reported a pooled sensitivity of 73%, with higher sensitivity for macrometastases than for micrometastases (94% versus 40%) .…”
Section: Intraoperative Evaluation (Ioe) Of Slnsmentioning
confidence: 99%