2015
DOI: 10.1080/10686967.2015.11918428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieving Customer Specifications Through Process Improvement Using Six Sigma: Case Study of NutriSoil – Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Baia (2015). “Achieving customer specifications through process improvement using Six Sigma: Case study of NutriSoil—Portugal,” Journal of Quality Management .…”
Section: The Systematic Literature Review (Slr) and Its Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baia (2015). “Achieving customer specifications through process improvement using Six Sigma: Case study of NutriSoil—Portugal,” Journal of Quality Management .…”
Section: The Systematic Literature Review (Slr) and Its Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savings were claimed due to lowered usage of a variety of resources. Examples include less employee time (e.g., fewer materials handlers and elimination of weekend cycle counting (Mistry, 2005a, 2005b), less overtime (Billesbach, 1994), shorter process time via better tooling (Deb et al, 2010), fewer production workers (Billesbach, 1994; Conti, 1996), and fewer hours lost to safety incidents and associated lower insurance premiums (Karuppan et al, 1996)); lowered inventory levels and associated holding costs (e.g., Billesbach, 1994; Kaplinsky, 1994); less need for facility space (e.g., due to less inventory on factory floor or in stock rooms [Kaplinsky, 1994; Mistry, 2005a, 2005b]), reduced use of material and labor (e.g., by reducing scrap and rework (Carmignani, 2017; Hung et al, 2011; Murugaiah et al, 2010; Orbak, 2012; Thomas et al, 2009), use of less or cheaper materials (Deb et al, 2010; Krovvidi et al, 2019; Randhawa & Ahuja, 2018) or by more exact filling of packages (Baia, 2015), less use of water (Kaushik & Khanduja, 2009; Pinto Jr. & Mendes, 2017), less energy consumption (Pinto Jr. & Mendes, 2017; Thomas et al, 2009), and lower production costs by rebalancing workers on machines (Kovács, 2020; Sarkar et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Systematic Literature Review (Slr) and Its Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeks kapabilitas proses Cpk merupakan index pengukuran kapabilitas proses untuk menghasilkan produk yang baik dengan. menetapkan hubungan antara spesifikasi produk dan variabilitas proses [14].…”
unclassified