Multiple strategies have been used to improve the safety and efficacy of regional primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) programs. [1][2][3] Strategies that may improve first medical contact to device times include prehospital cardiac catheterization laboratory activation and bypass of non-PCI-capable hospitals or emergency departments. 4,5 Although rerouting patients directly to PCI centers may eliminate potential delays associated with transfer of STEMI patients for primary PCI, 5 ≈50% of patients with STEMI do not arrive to an emergency department via ambulance.6 Thus, regional systems of care face the ongoing challenge of determining best practices for timely transfer of patients from STEMI referring centers to STEMI PCI hospitals.Although significant progress has been made in achieving short ischemic time intervals for patients presenting directly to PCI centers, transfer STEMI time intervals remain a challenge.7,8 Both European and US STEMI guidelines recommend first medical contact to device time of ≤120 minutes for the transfer STEMI population 9,10 : STEMI referring facilities unable to achieve this 2-hour interval should consider fibrinolytic therapy as the primary reperfusion strategy.11 Timely first door-to-device intervals have been achieved for transfer patients in selected regional programs.12,13 However, recentBackground-Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend transfer and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients within the time limit of first contact to device ≤120 minutes. We determined the hospital-level, patient-level, and process characteristics of timely versus delayed primary PCI for a diverse national sample of transfer patients confined to a travel distance that facilitates the process. Methods and Results-We studied 14 518 patients transferred from non-PCI-capable hospitals for primary PCI to 398 National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines hospitals between July 2008 and December 2012. Patients with estimated transfer times >60 minutes (by Google Maps driving times) were excluded from the analysis. Patients achieving first door-to-device time ≤120 minutes were compared with patients with delayed treatment; independent predictors of timely treatment were determined using generalized estimating equations logistic regression models. The median estimated transfer distance was 26.5 miles. First door-to-device ≤120 minutes was achieved in 65% of patients (n=9380); only 37% of the hospitals were high-performing hospitals (defined as risk-adjusted rate, ≥75% of transfer STEMI patients with ≤120-minute first door-to-device time). In addition to known predictors of delay (cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and prolonged door-in door-out time), STEMI referral hospitals' rural location and longer estimated transfer time were identifi...