1970
DOI: 10.1051/metal/197067050427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

aciers inoxydables austénitiques au chrome-nickel-manganèse-azote

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works (Murgulescu and Radovici, 1960, Knyazheva et al, 1965, Condylis et al, 1970, Shams et al, 1973, Lunarska et al, 1975 showed that Mn addition exerted a detrimental effect on the passivation of austenitic stainless steels (without any further explanation) and showed a deleterious effect on the pitting corrosion of austenitic steels, due to the increase in the amount of MnS inclusions (Ryan et al, 2002, Schmuki et al, 2005, Pardo et al, 2008. Considering that the sulfur content in current steels is 20 ppm maximum (see Table 1), there must be a limit (given by the mass balance) for the amount of MnS inclusions, which can be formed in these steels by increasing the Mn content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous works (Murgulescu and Radovici, 1960, Knyazheva et al, 1965, Condylis et al, 1970, Shams et al, 1973, Lunarska et al, 1975 showed that Mn addition exerted a detrimental effect on the passivation of austenitic stainless steels (without any further explanation) and showed a deleterious effect on the pitting corrosion of austenitic steels, due to the increase in the amount of MnS inclusions (Ryan et al, 2002, Schmuki et al, 2005, Pardo et al, 2008. Considering that the sulfur content in current steels is 20 ppm maximum (see Table 1), there must be a limit (given by the mass balance) for the amount of MnS inclusions, which can be formed in these steels by increasing the Mn content.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this sense, Mn has been used to partially replace Ni in some grades of austenitic stainless steels (Charles, 2005). Prior investigations reported that Mn addition promoted a negative effect on the general corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steels (Murgulescu and Radovici, 1960, Knyazheva et al, 1965, Condylis et al, 1970, Shams et al,. 1973, Lunarska et al,.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of passive film formed in glacial acetic acid by XPS revealed enrichment of chromium ions on the surface in form of chromium oxide irrespective of nickel content in this stainless steel [14] .In a potentiodynamic study in sulfuric acid at 20 C and 50 C Condylis et al [17] observed similar corrosion behavior of 204L & 304L For food contact applications, ion release during cooking of food stuffs is a very vital aspect. In this aspect also Cr-Mn stainless steels perform very well as shown for 204Cu in Table 4.…”
Section: [Fig 13]mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The manganese stabilises the austenitic phase like nickel and is economical (∼75 % lower in cost) compared to nickel, hence it is used as an alternative. The addition of manganese in stainless steel has a contradictory effect on the pitting and crevice corrosion behaviour and it depends on the critical concentration [13–17]. A significant drop in pitting potential ( E pit ) of 18 chromium‐5 nickel stainless steel in 0.1 M sulfuric acid +0.1 M sodium chloride, with 0.03 % of manganese addition and above 5.7 % of manganese addition showed no change in pitting potential [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%