24th Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1986
DOI: 10.2514/6.1986-170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic and turbulence influences on stall hysteresis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without PSJ actuation, the airfoil stalls at = 15.5 • , signified by an abrupt change of the lift and drag coefficients. A hysteresis loop is exhibited between = 13 • and = 15 • , which is expected for this type of airfoil at a chord-based Reynolds number of O(10 5 ) (Marchman et al 1987;Timmer 2008). When PSJ actuation is applied, the stall angle is postponed to approximately 22 • , and the hysteresis loop observed in the baseline case is completely eliminated, which is consistent with the observations of Post and Corke (2004b) where the same airfoil (NACA-0015) is tested with SDBDAs at Re c = 1.6 × 10 5 .…”
Section: Balance Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Without PSJ actuation, the airfoil stalls at = 15.5 • , signified by an abrupt change of the lift and drag coefficients. A hysteresis loop is exhibited between = 13 • and = 15 • , which is expected for this type of airfoil at a chord-based Reynolds number of O(10 5 ) (Marchman et al 1987;Timmer 2008). When PSJ actuation is applied, the stall angle is postponed to approximately 22 • , and the hysteresis loop observed in the baseline case is completely eliminated, which is consistent with the observations of Post and Corke (2004b) where the same airfoil (NACA-0015) is tested with SDBDAs at Re c = 1.6 × 10 5 .…”
Section: Balance Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Mueller 1985). The relatively high turbulence intensity in the tunnel (about 0.25 %) could be a reason why i t was not observed (Marchman, Sumantran & Schaefer 1987). However, the exact cause remains unknown as hysteresis has been observed under comparable or even higher ambient turbulence levels; on the other hand, the phenomenon is known to depend on other factors like airfoil shape, aspect ratio, Reynolds number, etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fully attached or massively separated flow is observed for the same angle of attack, depending on whether the configuration is reached by increasing or decreasing (in a quasistatic way) the angle of attack. This hysteresis was subsequently observed for various airfoils, mostly for transitional flow regimes Re ∼ 10 5 (Mueller et al 1983;Pohlen & Mueller 1984;Marchman, Sumantran & Schaefer 1987) and more recently for turbulent flow regimes (Re ∼ 10 6 ) (Broeren & Bragg 2001;Hristov & Ansell 2018). The low-frequency oscillation of the aerodynamic coefficients of an airfoil near stall was thoroughly investigated by Zaman, Bar-Sever & Mangalam (1987), who first confirmed that it was due to a natural flow oscillation rather than a structural vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%