SAE Technical Paper Series 2012
DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-0800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Characterization of Automotive Mufflers - Part I: Test Rig Design and Evaluation of Acoustic Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underlying idea is to exploit simplified approaches (1D and quasi-3D) for DOE practice and to confine the usage of fully 3D simulations to perform the final validation where possible optimization of details is required. Despite the use of the above mentioned numerical approaches has proved to be predictive in case of simplified configurations [3,14,16], in the present work the numerical simulations are further validated by experimental measurements performed on real configurations by means of a dedicated acoustic test rig [17]. This comparison made possible to point out the quality of agreement that can be achieved by numerical approaches with real configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The underlying idea is to exploit simplified approaches (1D and quasi-3D) for DOE practice and to confine the usage of fully 3D simulations to perform the final validation where possible optimization of details is required. Despite the use of the above mentioned numerical approaches has proved to be predictive in case of simplified configurations [3,14,16], in the present work the numerical simulations are further validated by experimental measurements performed on real configurations by means of a dedicated acoustic test rig [17]. This comparison made possible to point out the quality of agreement that can be achieved by numerical approaches with real configurations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Downstream to the second measurement section an acoustic termination sets acoustic boundary condition. The experimental measurements evaluate the acoustic pressure fields at the inlet and outlet of the air-box; the acoustic pressure waves are divided into incident and reflected components [17]. The measurement technique adopted to evaluate such waves on the two sides of the air-box is the multi-microphone technique [18].…”
Section: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While all these theoretical tools are fundamental to the analysis and optimization of the acoustic response of ATS, their validity is highly dependent on the availability of reliable experimental data. In the literature, there is a wide variety of techniques for measuring the acoustic behaviour of dissipative systems [21]. These techniques range from techniques with external sound level meters [22] to techniques using multiple sensors in the ducts [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques range from techniques with external sound level meters [22] to techniques using multiple sensors in the ducts [23]. In this last approach, it is possible to find methods with different degrees of complexity, from those that use two sensors located at the inlet and outlet of the element to be analysed [24], to those that use multiple sensors at the inlet and outlet and allow systems to be characterized with greater complexity, both at the structural level and regarding flow conditions [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, PF modelling requires specific tools capable of predicting its operation under different unsteady flow conditions and with different PM loading. In the literature, there is a wide variety of experimental techniques that can be use to measure the acoustic behaviour of after-treatment systems [69]. These techniques range from those with external sound level meters [70] to techniques using multiple sensors in the ducts [71], typically condenser (pressure) microphones.…”
Section: Historical Evolution Of Studies In Atfertreatment Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%