2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic modeling of micro-lattices obtained by additive manufacturing

Abstract: The acoustic behavior of 3D printed micro-lattices is investigated to assess the impact of defects induced by the Fused Deposition Modeling technique on the parameters of the equivalent uid medium. It is shown that the manufacturing process leads to three types of non-trivial defects: elliptical lament section, lament section shrinkage and lament surface rugosity. Not considering these defects may lead to acoustic predictions errors such as an underestimation of around 0.1 of the rigid backing absorption coeci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurements are preformed between 500 Hz and 6000 Hz. Because of the printing inherent defects, the JCAL parameters dependence on the infill factor were obtained by inverse characterization of a set of eight homogeneous samples followed by an interpolation over the infill factor scope 37 . The JCAL parameters of the characterized samples along with their interpolation (infill factor ∈ [10; 70]%), are presented in Appendix C.…”
Section: E Constraint To Be Monotonic Gradient Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements are preformed between 500 Hz and 6000 Hz. Because of the printing inherent defects, the JCAL parameters dependence on the infill factor were obtained by inverse characterization of a set of eight homogeneous samples followed by an interpolation over the infill factor scope 37 . The JCAL parameters of the characterized samples along with their interpolation (infill factor ∈ [10; 70]%), are presented in Appendix C.…”
Section: E Constraint To Be Monotonic Gradient Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, new acoustic materials (or their prototypes) are already being developed using AM technologies, e.g. : 3D printed periodic foams [13], optimally graded porous materials [2], adaptable sound absorbers [14], acoustic metamaterials based on the Kelvin cell [15], soundabsorbing micro-lattices [16], metallic phononic crystals for use in water [17], periodic acoustic structures composed of rigid micro-rods [18] or micro-bars [19], and even micro-perforated panels [20,21] and plates with complex patterns of micro-slits [22]. Most of this research indicates great potential for the development of new acoustic materials using AM technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, AM techniques have been used to produce a variety of sound-absorbing materials, including Helmholtz resonators [ 29 ], straight [ 30 ], inclined [ 31 ], angled tubes [ 29 ], sound crystals [ 32 ]. Moreover, microperforated plates [ 33 ] and sounds absorbers made of micro-grids [ 34 , 35 , 36 ] have been manufactured (see also [ 26 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ]). The additive manufacturing of porous absorbers has also been addressed in a rudimentary way in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zielinski et al have performed a 3D printing process comparison with different materials using porous absorbers, revealing that the process parameters have a crucial influence on the reproducibility of acoustically effective structures [ 37 ]. Boulvert et al have presented studies on geometrical factors influencing the acoustic properties, in which mainly the gradation of porosity is realized via the infill of the porous absorbers [ 38 ]. This approach is similar to the one shown in [ 26 ], where grading the porosity via the infill alone does not fully exploit the design potential of additive manufacturing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%