ICASSP '81. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1981.1171182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic noise suppression in the context of a perceptual model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perceptual criteria can involve aspects of both speech production or speech audition. Use of perceptual criteria has also been shown to aid in reducing annoying artifacts or speech correlated distortion in the enhanced speech (Hansen and Clements, 1991;Nandkumar and Hansen, 1992, 1994, 1995Peterson and Boll, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perceptual criteria can involve aspects of both speech production or speech audition. Use of perceptual criteria has also been shown to aid in reducing annoying artifacts or speech correlated distortion in the enhanced speech (Hansen and Clements, 1991;Nandkumar and Hansen, 1992, 1994, 1995Peterson and Boll, 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for this is that most auditory models decompose the speech signal into complex auditory neural representations, from which it is difficult to resynthesize enhanced speech. Earlier studies, such as spectral subtraction in the loudness domain (Peterson and Boll, 1981) and adaptive filtering based on a degraded speech spectrum convolved with a frequency-dependent lateral inhibition function (Cheng and O'Shaughnessy, 1991), have attempted to augment traditional enhancement frameworks with an auditory processing property. In this study, a previously developed dual-channel Wiener filtering framework (Nandkumar and Hansen, 1992) is augmented with constraints based on several aspects of the auditory process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%