2000
DOI: 10.1159/000028489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic Vowel Reduction in Creek: Effects of Distinctive Length and Position in the Word

Abstract: Eight speakers (4 male and 4 female) of the Muskogee dialect of Creek pronounced a set of words illustrating the vowels and diphthongs of Creek. These recordings were analyzed acoustically and data on vowel duration and vowel formant frequencies are presented in this paper. The ratio of the durations of dictinctively long and short vowels was 1.8. This ratio showed a sex difference, being larger for female speakers than it was for male speakers. Final lengthening was also observed: both distinctively long and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wassink (1999) found Jamaican female speakers to exhibit greater durational differences between long and short vowel pairs than male speakers. Johnson and Martin (2001) found the same for the non-Indo-European language Creek. For Swedish, Ericsdotter and Ericsson (2001) show that females produced longer vowel durations than males only in places of stress.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Wassink (1999) found Jamaican female speakers to exhibit greater durational differences between long and short vowel pairs than male speakers. Johnson and Martin (2001) found the same for the non-Indo-European language Creek. For Swedish, Ericsdotter and Ericsson (2001) show that females produced longer vowel durations than males only in places of stress.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Following Johnson (1997), these results would suggest that, assuming a constant larynx position, the TB remains stable for /i/ across different prosodic boundaries, while the front cavity becomes shorter, perhaps through lip-spreading. Given the above results, we conclude that the effects of prosodic boundary on /i/ vowel formants are not extensive.…”
Section: Acoustic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A rich body of cross-linguistic phonetic literature has shown that the final syllable of a prosodic unit is subject to lengthening (Oller (1973), Klatt (1975), Beckman and Edwards (1990), Edwards et al (1991), Wightman et al (1992), and Johnson and Martin (2001), among many others). Although it is generally agreed that the utterance-final position induces the greatest lengthening effects (Oller (1973), Klatt (1975), Beckman and Edwards (1990), Wightman et al (1992), Hofhuis et al (1995), Byrd (2000), Cho and Keating (2001)), non-prepausal word-final lengthening has also been documented (Lehiste (1960), Lindblom (1968), Oller (1973), Klatt (1975), Beckman and Edwards (1990)).…”
Section: Contour Tones Prefer Final Syllables Not Initial Onesmentioning
confidence: 99%