2019 22nd Conference on Innovation in Clouds, Internet and Networks and Workshops (ICIN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icin.2019.8685878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACQUA: A user friendly platform for lightweight network monitoring and QoE forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, they showed that video streaming QoE is influenced by both the duration and the frequency of stalling events. On the other hand, we have mobile applications (e.g., ACQUA 6 ) able to infer QoE from network measurements made on the end users' mobile devices. The ACQUA application uses machine learning models calibrated with controlled experiments so as to capture the link between network level QoS (e.g., throughput, delay, and loss rate) and the objective QoE 6 …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, they showed that video streaming QoE is influenced by both the duration and the frequency of stalling events. On the other hand, we have mobile applications (e.g., ACQUA 6 ) able to infer QoE from network measurements made on the end users' mobile devices. The ACQUA application uses machine learning models calibrated with controlled experiments so as to capture the link between network level QoS (e.g., throughput, delay, and loss rate) and the objective QoE 6 …”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though 5G networks promise high connectivity and huge transmission capacity aiming to take the internet services and the corresponding user experience to the next level [3], [4], bandwidth sharing is still an important issue for network operators and content providers, especially in view of the exponential rise of video traffic volume ( Figure 1). It turns out that the objective aspect of Quality of Experience is tightly correlated to terminal playout characteristics (e.g., size, resolution) but also to network conditions [5], [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the video streaming QoE is either dependent on the content itself (the video bitrate and resolution) or the application level QoS metrics such as start up delay, duration of stalls and resolution switches [8]- [12]. The latter application level metrics are proved to be tightly correlated to the network level QoS (e.g., throughput, delay and loss rate) [13]- [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies manage to highlight some key QoE metrics such as stalls, average resolution, and representation fluctuations from measurements on the encrypted traffic and by using machine learning [10]. These studies mainly rely on the fact that application level metrics are proved to be tightly correlated to the network level QoS [11]- [13]. However, they overlook an important information regarding the resolution of the viewport on which the video is played out and its impact on the user QoE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%