1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1984.tb02309.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acquisition of Skeletal Conditioned Responses in Pavlovian Conditioning

Abstract: There are four stages in the acquisition of skeletal responses when employing Pavlovian methodology: contingency detection, response selection, response acquisition, and response shaping. A two‐phase output model describes in detail the underlying response likelihood changes across the first three of the stages. Phase 1 of the model applies to the first two stages while Phase 2 applies to stage three. It was shown that Phases 1 and 2 are independent by virtue of the fact that shifts in the parameters of one ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is also supported by the Griffin et al (2004) study, in which learning was retarded in the T--group only in the initial phase of conditioning. In sum, together with earlier findings, our results based on spontaneous brain activity recordings and the use of a standard trace paradigm, support Prokasy's (1984) theory of two distinct phases in learning: the first phase, including the formation of the CS-US association and the selection of the correct response, seems to be dependent on the hippocampal oscillatory activity, while the second phase of response acquisition is mediated by other brain structures, perhaps the medial prefrontal cortex (Takehara et al, 2003) or the cerebellum (for a review see Thompson, 2005).…”
Section: Hippocampal Theta Activity Is Crucial Only In the Initial Pasupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion is also supported by the Griffin et al (2004) study, in which learning was retarded in the T--group only in the initial phase of conditioning. In sum, together with earlier findings, our results based on spontaneous brain activity recordings and the use of a standard trace paradigm, support Prokasy's (1984) theory of two distinct phases in learning: the first phase, including the formation of the CS-US association and the selection of the correct response, seems to be dependent on the hippocampal oscillatory activity, while the second phase of response acquisition is mediated by other brain structures, perhaps the medial prefrontal cortex (Takehara et al, 2003) or the cerebellum (for a review see Thompson, 2005).…”
Section: Hippocampal Theta Activity Is Crucial Only In the Initial Pasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Recordings from multiple time periods were analyzed because the hippocampal theta activity is generally thought to reflect the state of awareness or openness to external stimulation, and this behavioral/motivational state is possibly altered by the presentation of the conditioning stimuli. The learning rate was quantified both in early (trials to 5 th CR, Thompson, Berry, Rinaldi, & Berger, 1979) and late (trials to asymptote) phases of learning 5 as defined by Prokasy (1984).We anticipated that the hippocampal theta ratio recorded before any training is connected to learning rate especially in the early phase of trace eyeblink conditioning (effect of theta-contingent conditioning: Griffin et al, 2004). We also expected to observe differing changes in the hippocampal theta ratio as a function of both training and learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning criterion of asymptotic performance was considered to be met when the subject performed a CR on 8 of 9 consecutive paired or CS-alone trials or showed Ͼ50% CRs during a single session. Learning rate was defined as the number of conditioning trials needed to perform the fifth CR (phase 1) (Prokasy, 1984). To define the rate of extinction, a criterion of Ͻ30% CRs during one session was set.…”
Section: Recordings and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously trained animals in the yoked control (YC) group received trials regardless of their hippocampal oscillatory state. We hypothesized that the ripple-contingent (Rϩ) group would learn faster in the early, hippocampus-dependent phase of conditioning (Prokasy, 1984;Kim et al, 1995) due to the elevated responsiveness to the conditioned stimulus (Buzsáki, 1986). Alternatively, as ripples occur only in the explicit absence of theta oscillation (Buzsáki, 2002) and because trace conditioning in the explicit absence of theta oscillation has been shown to retard learning (Griffin et al, 2004), the Rϩ group could also learn at a slower rate, implying that the theta state is selectively beneficial for learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation