2006
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acrylic bone cements with bismuth salicylate: Behavior in simulated physiological conditions

Abstract: In a previous work, we reported the development of acrylic bone cement formulations for application in percutaneous vertebroplasty, by using bismuth salicylate (BS) as the radiopaque agent. Our objective was to obtain high radiopacity along with a therapeutical effect produced by the release of salicylic acid in situ. To follow that study, the setting kinetics and static and dynamical mechanical properties of the BS cements were studied in simulated physiological conditions. Moreover, radiopacity after various… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With one exception, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) (sometimes referred to as dynamic mechanical analysis, DMA), operated in three‐point bending mode, has been used to determine E ′, E ″, and tan δ, as a function of the cured cement specimen's temperature, T′ (at a fixed test frequency, f ) 69–71. In a DMTA test, typical specimen size is 25.0–40.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 1.0–1.5 mm, and typical test conditions are: displacement, 64 μm; static force, 60 m N ; dynamic force, 40 m N ; rate of heating of specimen, 2–4°C min −1 ; range of T ′: 20–200°C; and range of f = 1–30 Hz 69–71. The exception is a study in which the DMTA tests were performed on cured cement specimens, in a displacement control mode; that is, using a frequency sweep (0.01–100 Hz) and a temperature sweep (17–57°C) 67…”
Section: Acrylic Bone Cementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With one exception, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) (sometimes referred to as dynamic mechanical analysis, DMA), operated in three‐point bending mode, has been used to determine E ′, E ″, and tan δ, as a function of the cured cement specimen's temperature, T′ (at a fixed test frequency, f ) 69–71. In a DMTA test, typical specimen size is 25.0–40.0 mm × 10.0 mm × 1.0–1.5 mm, and typical test conditions are: displacement, 64 μm; static force, 60 m N ; dynamic force, 40 m N ; rate of heating of specimen, 2–4°C min −1 ; range of T ′: 20–200°C; and range of f = 1–30 Hz 69–71. The exception is a study in which the DMTA tests were performed on cured cement specimens, in a displacement control mode; that is, using a frequency sweep (0.01–100 Hz) and a temperature sweep (17–57°C) 67…”
Section: Acrylic Bone Cementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are confident that the use of powder mixing techniques or the dissolution of the radiopacifier 12,13 would improve the homogeneity and the visibility even more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Experimental formulations show higher radiopacity than traditional commercial cements used in arthroplasty (Simplex P and Osteopal G), due to the presence of the bismuth atom in the BS, which has been proven to give excellent X-ray visibility, 12,13 reducing the need of adding extra radiopacifiers.…”
Section: Radiopacitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These cements have comparable t set values, T max values, loss factor (dry specimens), and in vitro biocompatibility performance, but lower values of both UCS and UTS (after one month storage in saline solution, at 37°C) compared to a BaSO 4 ‐containing cement 64. Furthermore, the BS‐containing cements displayed a plasticizing effect as well as formation of pores in the aforementioned storage solution 64…”
Section: Alternative Cement Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The third approach involves a bismuth compound, such as bismuth salicylate, BS (either as received or coated with polyethylene oxide) that is blended into the cement powder or is dissolved in the liquid monomer 64. These cements have comparable t set values, T max values, loss factor (dry specimens), and in vitro biocompatibility performance, but lower values of both UCS and UTS (after one month storage in saline solution, at 37°C) compared to a BaSO 4 ‐containing cement 64. Furthermore, the BS‐containing cements displayed a plasticizing effect as well as formation of pores in the aforementioned storage solution 64…”
Section: Alternative Cement Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%