Acting professional: An exploration of culturally bounded norms against nonwork role referencing

Abstract

SummaryThis article presents three studies examining how cross-cultural variation in assumptions about the appropriateness of referencing nonwork roles while in work settings creates consequential impressions that affect professional outcomes. Study 1 reveals a perceived norm limiting the referencing of nonwork roles at work and provides evidence that it is a U.S. norm by showing that awareness of it varies as a function of tenure living in the United States. Studies 2 and 3 examine the implications of the norm for evaluations of job candidates. Study 2 finds that U.S. but not Indian participants negatively evaluate job candidates who endorse nonwork role referencing as a strategy to create rapport and shows that this cultural difference is largest among participants most familiar with norms of professionalism, those with prior recruiting experience. Study 3 finds that corporate job recruiters from the United States negatively evaluate candidates who endorse nonwork role referencing as a means of building rapport with a potential business partner. This research underlines the importance of navigating initial interactions in culturally appropriate ways to facilitate the development of longer-term collaborations and negotiation success.

Making Professional Decisions in Research: Measurement and Key Predictors

“…The prevalence of international researchers training and working in the U.S., international research collaborations, and the growing number of U.S. students training abroad underscore this need, as well as highlight the importance of cross-cultural considerations in research ethics education (Heitman 2014). Indeed, research in cross-cultural psychology indicates cultural differences do exist in judgments about socially appropriate behavior, perceptions of professionalism, and reasoning styles (Boucher and Maslach 2009; Heine and Ruby 2010; Resick et al 2011; Uhlmann et al 2013). Such differences may explain differences in responding on the PDR.…”

Job demands–resources: a gender perspective on employee well-being and resilience in retail stores in China

“…Because Chinese culture tends to value family over society, Chinese managers tend to consider that work responsibilities interfere with family responsibilities, whereas American managers are more likely to complain that family interferes with work responsibilities (Aryee, Fields, & Luk, 1999;Spector et al, 2007). Prior research suggests that Western cultures prefer a strict separation between work and non-work activities, whereas Eastern cultures tend to blur the boundary between work and non-work activities (Liu & Almor, 2016;Uhlmann, Heaphy, Ashford, Zhu, & Sanchez-Burks, 2013). Therefore, in this study well-being was measured as proxy by following the conceptualisation in terms of recovery and psychological detachment from work (Sonnentag, 2015) by asking the extent to which respondents reported 'I always worry about my job even after the office time' with 5-point Likert scales (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree).…”

Work-Life Ideologies: The Contextual Basis and Consequences of Beliefs About Work and Life

“…Common to these theoretical perspectives is the idea that employees are required to demonstrate unwavering commitment and dedication to work and to give work priority over personal life commitments. As a result, employees are negatively evaluated by managers when they signal commitment to their personal lives (e.g., Leslie, Manchester, Park, & Mehng, 2012;Uhlmann, Heaphy, Ashford, Zhu, & Sanchez-Burks, 2013).…”