2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action at a distance on object-related ventral temporal representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

12
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
12
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…grey matter voxel sets that share strong functional connectivity with the wider brain yield consistently better pattern discriminability than lesser-connected sets do, across all tested categories of information). These findings align with previous demonstrations that local OTC responses are shaped by distal connectivity with the wider brain (Amaral et al, under review;Chen et al, 2017;Garcea et al, 2019;Lee et al, 2019;Osher et al, 2016;Saygin et al, 2012;Saygin et al, 2016), and the more general proposal that functional brain responses are strongly determined by the integration of relevant information shared via structural and functional connectivity to the wider brain (Mahon & Caramazza, 2011;Osher et al, 2016;Park & Friston, 2013;Ruttorf et al, 2019;Saygin et al, 2012;Saygin et al, 2016;Sporns, 2004;Sporns & Zwi, 2004;Varela et al, 2001). Ultimately, local computations and the organization of representational content in OTC are dependent on interactions between connectivityconstrained neural assemblies that are likely dedicated to achieving particular computational goals (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…grey matter voxel sets that share strong functional connectivity with the wider brain yield consistently better pattern discriminability than lesser-connected sets do, across all tested categories of information). These findings align with previous demonstrations that local OTC responses are shaped by distal connectivity with the wider brain (Amaral et al, under review;Chen et al, 2017;Garcea et al, 2019;Lee et al, 2019;Osher et al, 2016;Saygin et al, 2012;Saygin et al, 2016), and the more general proposal that functional brain responses are strongly determined by the integration of relevant information shared via structural and functional connectivity to the wider brain (Mahon & Caramazza, 2011;Osher et al, 2016;Park & Friston, 2013;Ruttorf et al, 2019;Saygin et al, 2012;Saygin et al, 2016;Sporns, 2004;Sporns & Zwi, 2004;Varela et al, 2001). Ultimately, local computations and the organization of representational content in OTC are dependent on interactions between connectivityconstrained neural assemblies that are likely dedicated to achieving particular computational goals (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…More specifically, category-preferring OTC responses are functionally coupled with, and modulated by, distal regions that share the same category-preference (e.g. tool responses in medial fusiform gyrus are shaped by inferior parietal cortex; Amaral et al, under review; Chen et al, 2017; Garcea et al, 2019; Lee et al, 2019); similarly, OTC responses for multiple visual categories (e.g. faces, objects, bodies, & places) can be reliably predicted from patterns of white matter connectivity to the wider brain (Osher et al, 2016; Saygin et al, 2012; Saygin et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, connectivity is a major constraint on the functional organization of cerebral cortex in general, such that the functional response of a given region is partially determined by the integration of relevant information shared via structural and functional connectivity to other brain regions (e.g. Garcea et al, 2019;Lee et al, 2019;Mahon & Caramazza, 2011;Sporns & Zwi, 2004;Sporns, 2004). More specifically, category-preferring OTC responses are functionally coupled with, and modulated by, distal regions that share the same category-preference (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems likely, as manipulable object recognition takes place through parallel processing, indicating an intensive exchange of information between the ventral and dorsal stream components in tool recognition for action (e.g. [27], [28], [29]). Curiously, we did not observe any substantial difference in saccadic reaction times depending on tool orientation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%