2000
DOI: 10.1104/pp.122.4.1003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activation Tagging in Arabidopsis

Abstract: Activation tagging using T-DNA vectors that contain multimerized transcriptional enhancers from the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S gene has been applied to Arabidopsis plants. New activation-tagging vectors that confer resistance to the antibiotic kanamycin or the herbicide glufosinate have been used to generate several tens of thousands of transformed plants. From these, over 30 dominant mutants with various phenotypes have been isolated. Analysis of a subset of mutants has shown that overexpressed genes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
877
1
16

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 874 publications
(902 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
877
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…DET2 encodes a steroid 5a-reductase that catalyzes a key step in BR biosynthesis (Noguchi et al, 1999). This close proximity raised the possibility that the large-leaf phenotype we attributed to a disruption of PHT4;2 was instead caused by an overexpression of DET2 via T-DNA activation (Weigel et al, 2000;Ren et al, 2004). However, this possibility is inconsistent with our finding that the large-leaf phenotype (assessed by rosette fresh weight) segregated as a recessive trait in F2 progeny of a cross between the wild type and the homozygous mutant (14 wild type [1.69 6 0.06 g]:45 hemizygous mutant [1.56 6 0.10 g]:15 homozygous mutant [2.17 6 0.12 g]; x 2 = 3.48, P = 0.17).…”
Section: Plant Size and Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DET2 encodes a steroid 5a-reductase that catalyzes a key step in BR biosynthesis (Noguchi et al, 1999). This close proximity raised the possibility that the large-leaf phenotype we attributed to a disruption of PHT4;2 was instead caused by an overexpression of DET2 via T-DNA activation (Weigel et al, 2000;Ren et al, 2004). However, this possibility is inconsistent with our finding that the large-leaf phenotype (assessed by rosette fresh weight) segregated as a recessive trait in F2 progeny of a cross between the wild type and the homozygous mutant (14 wild type [1.69 6 0.06 g]:45 hemizygous mutant [1.56 6 0.10 g]:15 homozygous mutant [2.17 6 0.12 g]; x 2 = 3.48, P = 0.17).…”
Section: Plant Size and Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ztl-3 (31), ztl21 (29), fkf1 (37), cry1cry2 (38), cry1cry2phyA (39), cry1cry2phot1phot2 (40), and cop1-4 (41) mutants have been described. Transgenic Arabidopsis lines were prepared by floral dip transformation method (42,43). Phenotypes of transgenic plants were verified in at least three independent transgenic lines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yid1 mutant was screened from the T-DNA insertional mutant collection (Weigel et al, 2000;Qin et al, 2003). The mutants sfr6-2 and med25-2 were described previously (Knight et al, 2009;Xu and Li, 2011).…”
Section: Experimental Procedures Plant Growth Conditions and Iron-defmentioning
confidence: 99%