The vortex hazard produced by large airliners and increasingly larger airliners entering service, combined with projected rapid increases in the demand for air transportation, is expected to act as a major impediment to increased air traffic capacity. Significant reduction in the vortex hazard is possible, however, by employing active vortex alleviation techniques that reduce the wake severity by dynamically modifying its vortex characteristics, providing that the techniques do not degrade performance or compromise safety and ride quality. With this as background, a series of experiments were performed, initially at NASA Langley Research Center and subsequently at the Berlin University of Technology in collaboration with the German Aerospace Center. The investigations demonstrated the basic mechanism for managing trailing vortices using retrofitted devices that are decoupled from conventional control surfaces. The basic premise for managing vortices advanced here is rooted in the erstwhile forgotten hypothesis of Albert Betz, as extended and verified ingeniously by Coleman duPont Donaldson and his collaborators. Using these devices, vortices may be perturbed at arbitrarily long wavelengths down to wavelengths less than a typical airliner wingspan and the oscillatory loads on the wings, and hence the vehicle, are small. Significant flexibility in the specific device has been demonstrated using local passive and active separation control as well as local circulation control via Gurney flaps. The method is now in a position to be tested in a wind tunnel with a longer test section on a scaled airliner configuration. Alternatively, the method can be tested directly in a towing tank, on a model aircraft, a light aircraft or a full-scale airliner. The authors believed that this method will have significant appeal from an industry perspective due to its retrofit potential with little to no impact on cruise (devices tucked away in the cove or retracted); low operating power requirements; small lift oscillations when deployed in a time-dependent manner; and significant flexibility with respect to the specific devices selected. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics= slot width h G = Gurney flap height relative to the chord l G = Gurney flap span relative to the flap span L f = flap length, from slot to trailing-edge q = free-stream dynamic pressure r = distance measured form the vortex center Re = Reynolds number based on chord-length U j = peak jet slot blowing velocity U = free-stream velocity U,V,W = mean velocities in directions x,y,z X = distance from perturbation to wing trailing-edge x,y,z = coordinates measured from model leading-edge and root (left-hand system) = angle of attack s = static stall angle = flap deflection angle = wavelength = phase shift in degrees = vortex sheet strength, d /dy = bound circulation = rolled-up wake vortex strength = sweep-back angle x = streamwise vorticity, W/ y-V/ z * = indicates control