Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd002751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[794][795][796][797][798] The efficacy of ACD-CPR may be highly dependent on the quality and duration of training. 799 A meta-analysis of 10 trials of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and two of in-hospital cardiac arrest showed no early or late survival benefit to ACD-CPR over conventional CPR 234,800 and this is confirmed by another recent meta-analysis. 801 Two post-mortem studies have shown more rib and sternal fractures after ACD-CPR compared with conventional CPR, 802,803 but another found no difference.…”
Section: Active Compression-decompression Cpr (Acd-cpr)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…[794][795][796][797][798] The efficacy of ACD-CPR may be highly dependent on the quality and duration of training. 799 A meta-analysis of 10 trials of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and two of in-hospital cardiac arrest showed no early or late survival benefit to ACD-CPR over conventional CPR 234,800 and this is confirmed by another recent meta-analysis. 801 Two post-mortem studies have shown more rib and sternal fractures after ACD-CPR compared with conventional CPR, 802,803 but another found no difference.…”
Section: Active Compression-decompression Cpr (Acd-cpr)mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Studies indirectly comparing resuscitation outcomes between physician-staffed and other systems are difficult to interpret because of the heterogeneity among systems, independent of physician-staffing (LOE 5) 324 . High survival rates after cardiac arrest have been reported from systems that employ experienced physicians as part of the EMS response (LOE 3 325,326 ; LOE 4 310,312,327 ) and these survival rates may be higher than in systems that rely on nonphysician providers (LOE 2 328 ; LOE 3 325,326,329 ). Other comparisons noted no difference in survival between systems using paramedics or physicians as part of the response (LOE 3) 330,331 .…”
Section: Consensus On Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of mechanical devices may be involved in some cases ( 4 ) although they do not increase the incidence of serious complications. ( 2 ) Of note, only manual compressions were used in the patient we describe. The age of the patient and the fact that the CPR was performed by laypersons may perhaps have played a role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%