“…It can be further said that due to the strong relationship with critical literacy, as explained above, argument-based teaching is a promotor of active and responsible citizenship, a key requirement for 21st century. In fact, recent studies confirm that active citizenship, understood as an institutionally driven process favouring top-down and bottom-up participatory approaches (Bee, 2017), relates to practices of deliberative argumentation, manifesting the capacity to deeply understand and engage with others' points of view, even when they are opposing to one's own, and to co-create an integrated approach to common thinking and action (Larrain et al, compatible (e.g., Rapanta, 2021;Walker & Sampson, 2013) and often depend on each other (Iordanou et al, 2019). This is particularly the case when argument-based practices are promoted by ordinary teachers and not by researchers: in everyday pedagogical practice, curricular and argument-related goals intermingle, mainly because teachers need to fulfil a concrete curriculum without many deviations for "just" focusing on critical literacy development (although the latter would be much welcome and necessary).…”