2022
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2021.3055187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Design With Suppression of Sensor Noise Effects in Application to DC–DC Buck Power Converter

Abstract: The performance of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) algorithms can be limited in practice by high-frequency measurement noise. In this work, this problem is addressed by transforming the high-gain extended state observer (ESO), which is the inherent element of ADRC, into a new cascade observer structure. Set of experiments, performed on a DC-DC buck power converter system, show that the new cascade ESO design, compared to the conventional approach, effectively suppresses the detrimental effect of se… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, motivated by the obtained results of this research, the design of controls that considers the important problem of active disturbance rejection [65,66] and applications in mobile robotics and subactuated systems are considered as future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, motivated by the obtained results of this research, the design of controls that considers the important problem of active disturbance rejection [65,66] and applications in mobile robotics and subactuated systems are considered as future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also clear for this proposition, that the measurement noise and limited sampling remain the important factors in designing ADRC techniques in practice. (d) The scalability of ADRC scheme is retained in its error-based modification as one can easily change the observer from linear ESO (26) to a different one to address certain disadvantages of current design (like the limited disturbance reconstruction capabilities seen in ExpD and its potential remedy in SimD in form of inclusion of higher-order disturbance model). Further improvement in quality could also be possibly obtained by modifications in the controller and/or observer structure (e.g., utilization of noise suppressing observers [25,26] or reduced-order observers [18]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error-based ADRC has been successfully applied by now to a variety of control problems including mechanical vibration compensation [21,22], robotic manipulator control [23,24], observer design with suppression of sensor noise [25][26][27], position control of a telescope mount [28], UAV control [29,30], as well as power electronics control [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al combined the ADRC with the consensus algorithm to control multi-degree-of-freedom (DOF) parallel electrical manipulator systems, demonstrating better performance [38]. Łakomy et al improved the performance of the ADRC by using a new observer structure to address the problem caused by high-frequency measurement noise in practice [39]. Chi et al proposed an improved ADRC, using local dynamic linearization to realize the nonlinear system affine to control the input in the globally Lipschitz nonlinear discrete-time system [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%