2022
DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2150930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active esophageal cooling during radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium: data review and update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[43,44] To date, no AEF has yet been identified in a patient treated with active esophageal cooling using a dedicated esophageal cooling device, and only a single pericardio-esophageal fistula has been reported despite over 22,000 RF catheter ablations now completed using this cooling device. [45] Pericardio-esophageal fistula is a rare, and less severe, subset of fistula formation. [46] Analysis of this event suggests higher total energy was deposited over the esophagus than is typical, with higher ablation index targets on the posterior wall than the commonly used 380-400 units, and lesions stacked near the esophagus, which has recently been suggested to increase risk of injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43,44] To date, no AEF has yet been identified in a patient treated with active esophageal cooling using a dedicated esophageal cooling device, and only a single pericardio-esophageal fistula has been reported despite over 22,000 RF catheter ablations now completed using this cooling device. [45] Pericardio-esophageal fistula is a rare, and less severe, subset of fistula formation. [46] Analysis of this event suggests higher total energy was deposited over the esophagus than is typical, with higher ablation index targets on the posterior wall than the commonly used 380-400 units, and lesions stacked near the esophagus, which has recently been suggested to increase risk of injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,[11][12][13][14][15][16] In addition to significant safety improvements, a variety of other benefits have been reported including a reduction in fluoroscopy requirements, reduced postoperative chest pain, and increased long term procedural efficacy. 10,17,18 The cases described here suggest that utilizing proactive cooling does not disrupt the procedural flow of the hybrid convergent procedure but may simultaneously add the benefit of thermal protection. Because esophageal temperature monitoring is not required when proactive esophageal cooling is employed, premature discontinuation of energy delivery did not occur in any of the cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“… 8 , 11–16 In addition to significant safety improvements, a variety of other benefits have been reported including a reduction in fluoroscopy requirements, reduced postoperative chest pain, and increased long-term procedural efficacy. 10 , 17 , 18 This improved efficacy is believed to stem from the improved continuity index achieved when pauses and repositioning due to local overheating are eliminated. 19 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%