1975
DOI: 10.2514/3.59833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Flutter Suppression-A Flight Test Demonstration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On this basis, Fehren et al [5] proposed an improved scheme in 2001 and increased the number of piezoelectric actuators to 14. Besides, some other organizations are also concerned about the vibration of wind tunnel models. Up to now, a great many of convincing results has been obtained in thousands of attempts [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. And in term of algorithms, classical PD is still the most popular and practical control algorithm in engineering although it has some limitations, especially when the control objects are different, the parameters of the controller are difficult to adjust automatically to adapt to the changing of the external environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this basis, Fehren et al [5] proposed an improved scheme in 2001 and increased the number of piezoelectric actuators to 14. Besides, some other organizations are also concerned about the vibration of wind tunnel models. Up to now, a great many of convincing results has been obtained in thousands of attempts [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. And in term of algorithms, classical PD is still the most popular and practical control algorithm in engineering although it has some limitations, especially when the control objects are different, the parameters of the controller are difficult to adjust automatically to adapt to the changing of the external environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 A similar configuration was also used in the first flight test beyond flutter speed, conducted in 1973 on a modified B-52 aircraft. 7 The control system on that aircraft involved two single feedback loops that fed back filtered vertical acceleration signals, acquired on the wing, to control surfaces located nearby (outboard ailerons and flaperons). Collocated acceleration feedback is also proposed in various other publications concerned with flutter suppression, e. g. Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this approach does nothing to extend the operating envelope of the vehicle. Active control of aeroelastic instabilities has been studied for many years, and has been shown to increase flutter speed in flight tests [4]. More recently, Strganac et al [5] used a nonlinear adaptive controller to stabilize LCO in a rigid wind-tunnel wing section with nonlinear stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%