2016 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pedes.2016.7914358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active gate controlled SiC transfer switch for fault tolerant operation of ISOP multicellular dc-dc converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further analysis has to be done on simultaneous multiple faults. [51,92,93,95,96] phase-shift adjustment interleaved converters yes no not applicable [99,100] bypass of faulty module input series output parallel no yes (1 per module) low [94,98] bypass of faulty module MMCs no no low [101] bypass of faulty module cascaded DC-DC converters no yes (atleast 5) high [106] inclusion of redundant components dual-switch buck converters no yes (1 per module) low [104,105] inclusion of redundant components series-resonant DC-DC converter no yes (4 per module) medium [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103] inclusion of redundant components full bridge converters yes yes (3 per module) medium [44] inclusion of redundant components non-isolated multilevel converter yes yes (1 per module) low [39] inclusion of redundant components PSFB converter yes yes (2 per module) low [40,43] inclusion…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Further analysis has to be done on simultaneous multiple faults. [51,92,93,95,96] phase-shift adjustment interleaved converters yes no not applicable [99,100] bypass of faulty module input series output parallel no yes (1 per module) low [94,98] bypass of faulty module MMCs no no low [101] bypass of faulty module cascaded DC-DC converters no yes (atleast 5) high [106] inclusion of redundant components dual-switch buck converters no yes (1 per module) low [104,105] inclusion of redundant components series-resonant DC-DC converter no yes (4 per module) medium [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103] inclusion of redundant components full bridge converters yes yes (3 per module) medium [44] inclusion of redundant components non-isolated multilevel converter yes yes (1 per module) low [39] inclusion of redundant components PSFB converter yes yes (2 per module) low [40,43] inclusion…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 15 Fault-tolerant implementation in input series output parallel converter [102,103] (Q 1 , Q 2 , Q n denotes the bypass switches) Fig. 16 FTO of full bridge DC-DC converter depends on auxiliary winding connected in secondary winding of transformer [39] Fig.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Converter Reconfiguration Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In DC-DC converter topologies with modular structure whose original architecture does not provide enough elements to develop bypass functions, it becomes necessary to introduce additional discrete components, aiming to obtain fault tolerance capabilities. It is the case of the input-series output-parallel (ISOP) converter [45][46] , where the faulty module is bypassed resorting to additional components, such as thyristors or solid-state relays (SSRs), following the configuration shown in Fig. 13.…”
Section: Bypass Of Faulty Module(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%