2012
DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2011.569919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active internalism and open dynamical systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work on dynamic systems shows how this may be accomplished, with theoretically interesting results. Yoshimi ( 2012 ) identifies what he calls “active internalism” to describe open dynamical systems. In this view, the dynamics of the environment interact continually with dynamics that are intrinsic (or “internal”) to a cognitive system.…”
Section: Implications Of the Dynamic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent work on dynamic systems shows how this may be accomplished, with theoretically interesting results. Yoshimi ( 2012 ) identifies what he calls “active internalism” to describe open dynamical systems. In this view, the dynamics of the environment interact continually with dynamics that are intrinsic (or “internal”) to a cognitive system.…”
Section: Implications Of the Dynamic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This produces a new landscape that is shaped by this active interaction. Yoshimi ( 2012 ) supplies some elegant examples of this in the realms of consciousness and phenomenology. The process of perspective-taking could make use of this same modeling strategy—task parameters may be explicitly modeled as part of the landscape of responses.…”
Section: Implications Of the Dynamic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now an impressive array of arguments for, and versions of, extended cognition (e.g., Clark 2008;Clark and Chalmers 1998;Gibbs 2001;Haugeland 1998;Hurley 2010;Hutchins 1995;Menary 2006;Noë 2004;Rockwell 2005;Rowlands 2003; Silberstein and Chemero 2011;Sutton 2010;Theiner 2011;van Gelder 1995;Wilson 2004), and these are being met by ever more articulated counterarguments, issuing from advocates of the internalist cognitive orthodoxy (e.g., Aizawa 2001, 2008;Block 2005;Grush 2003;Horgan and Kriegel 2008;O'Brien 1998;Preston 2010;Prinz 2006;Rupert 2004;Weiskopf 2008). Consonant with the nature of such long-standing controversies, there are also some voices urging pluralism and proclaiming the need to acknowledge the truth in each of the opposing parties (Yoshimi 2012). It is therefore not without some trepidation that one may venture to offer yet another contribution to this debate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nearby points in this space, according to some distance metric, are seen as representing similar conceptual states, allowing regions and manifolds within this space to capture more general concepts (Shepard 1987). The evolution of mental states over time becomes a trajectory in this vector space (Yoshimi 2012), driven by mechanistic cognitive processes (Churchland 1989). In general, the CVS approach has been very productive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%