2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20154241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Magnetic-Field Stabilization with Atomic Magnetometer

Abstract: A magnetically-quiet environment is important for detecting faint magnetic-field signals or nonmagnetic spin-dependent interactions. Passive magnetic shielding using layers of large magnetic-permeability materials is widely used to reduce the magnetic-field noise. The magnetic-field noise can also be actively monitored with magnetometers and then compensated, acting as a complementary method to the passive shielding. We present here a general model to quantitatively depict and optimize the performance of activ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full and precise knowledge of the frequency response of the OPM can help to automatically optimize parameters of the closed-loop operation of the OPM and thus help to extend the bandwidth of the OPM without losing its sensitivity, or to improve the identity between the frequency responses of different OPMs to improve the noise rejection ratio of the gradiometer [26]. As closed-loop magnetic-noise-compensation setups require adequate knowledge of the system response, our work can also help to improve the performance of the active magnetic-field stabilization operated in the Earth's field [29,37] which is attractive for ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance [7] and for recording bio-magnetic signals from human brain activities in unshielded environments [26,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Full and precise knowledge of the frequency response of the OPM can help to automatically optimize parameters of the closed-loop operation of the OPM and thus help to extend the bandwidth of the OPM without losing its sensitivity, or to improve the identity between the frequency responses of different OPMs to improve the noise rejection ratio of the gradiometer [26]. As closed-loop magnetic-noise-compensation setups require adequate knowledge of the system response, our work can also help to improve the performance of the active magnetic-field stabilization operated in the Earth's field [29,37] which is attractive for ultralow-field nuclear magnetic resonance [7] and for recording bio-magnetic signals from human brain activities in unshielded environments [26,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We find that the frequency response of alkali atoms based OPM is also influenced by the NLZ effect. Full and precise knowledge about the OPM's frequency response is important for parameter adjusting in control systems that involve the OPM, such as the closed-loop operation of the OPM [28], or the magnetic-field stabilization with OPM [29]. In the case of a small amplitude of the magnetic field, the NLZ effect is much smaller than the magnetic resonance linewidth and the frequency response of the OPM is typically a first-order Butterworth low-pass filter [28,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the extended flat gain ( ≈ Γ∕2 ) and the extended flat phase ( ≈ Γ ) conditions can be of interest in magnetometric applications, e.g. in the detection of magnetic signals with spectral components which range from zero to (about) Γ or when the magnetometric signal is used to feed a closed-loop system for active field stabilization [52,53].…”
Section: First-order Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity noise spectral density (NSD) is calculated under the free-running and single-closed-loop modes. Subsequently, the noise rejection ratio (NRR) is introduced to represent the noise suppression effect [29] :…”
Section: Intensity Noise Suppressionmentioning
confidence: 99%