Current Trends in Radiation Protection 2020
DOI: 10.1051/978-2-7598-0117-6.c008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Methods & Instruments for Personal Dosimetry of External Radiation: Present Situation in Europe and Future Needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of neutrons, the accuracy limitations of rem-meters, passive and active dosimeters are well known as all these technologies have dosimetric responses that depart from unity over significant portions of the thermal to 20 MeV energy range (Cosak and Lesiecki 1985, Luszik-Bhadra et al 2002, Bolognese-Milsztajn 2004, Berthold 2021. For that radiation type, source term measurements may be the most accurate method for the determination of the lens of the eye dose.…”
Section: Photon Beta and Neutron Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of neutrons, the accuracy limitations of rem-meters, passive and active dosimeters are well known as all these technologies have dosimetric responses that depart from unity over significant portions of the thermal to 20 MeV energy range (Cosak and Lesiecki 1985, Luszik-Bhadra et al 2002, Bolognese-Milsztajn 2004, Berthold 2021. For that radiation type, source term measurements may be the most accurate method for the determination of the lens of the eye dose.…”
Section: Photon Beta and Neutron Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%