2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00180.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Parental Consent for a School‐Based Community Violence Screening: Comparing Distribution Methods

Abstract: Overall return rates and rates of consent for screening participation were substantially higher when the consent form and accompanying materials were provided directly to parents rather than distributed in the classroom and sent home with students. These findings have implications for efforts to obtain active consent from parents for students to participate in school mental health programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, parent and student survey response rates were low (approximately 30%). While this is not unusual when active parental consent is required for research conducted in schools (as in this study) [66, 67], the low response rates may have led to nonresponse bias. This might have resulted in an overestimate of rates of active transport to school, though this bias is likely to be similar at baseline and followup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Further, parent and student survey response rates were low (approximately 30%). While this is not unusual when active parental consent is required for research conducted in schools (as in this study) [66, 67], the low response rates may have led to nonresponse bias. This might have resulted in an overestimate of rates of active transport to school, though this bias is likely to be similar at baseline and followup.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, this rate was typical of other school-based studies of urban youth. 50,51 Generalizability might also be limited because the participants who remained in the cohort (e.g., English-speaking only, lived with both parents, reported making grades of A and B, less likely to have had a boyfriend or girlfriend) might be at lower risk for engaging in dating violence than students who did not remain in the cohort. Fourth, although we used multilevel modeling to adjust the regression estimates and standard errors for ICC among students within the same school, a larger number of schools would be preferable and would produce more accurate estimates of the variance components in the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that this recruitment rate is consistent with that of other school-based research studies (e.g., Blom-Hoffman et al, 2009). For example, Stein and colleagues (2007) assessed rates of active parental consent in research assessing exposure to violence and PTSD among Latino and African American school children. Their results suggest that only 46.4% of distributed consent forms resulted in parental consent whereas 23% resulted in active refusal (Stein et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Stein and colleagues (2007) assessed rates of active parental consent in research assessing exposure to violence and PTSD among Latino and African American school children. Their results suggest that only 46.4% of distributed consent forms resulted in parental consent whereas 23% resulted in active refusal (Stein et al, 2007). The authors reasoned that the sensitive nature of the questions and parental concerns about having their children respond to questions about violence exposure contribute to lower recruitment rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%