2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active restoration facilitates bird community recovery in an Afrotropical rainforest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our models included both site identity and year, with a nested effect of ordinal day, as random effects. For the purpose of our linear mixed models, we square root transformed observed bird abundance, which lessens the influence of the most abundant species (Latja et al 2016). We visually assessed our data for normality and homoscedasticity in R. We calculated marginal and conditional R² values for each of our models using rsquared in R package "piecewiseSEM" (Table 1; Lefcheck 2016), and pvalues using R package "lmerTest" (Kuznetova et al 2017).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our models included both site identity and year, with a nested effect of ordinal day, as random effects. For the purpose of our linear mixed models, we square root transformed observed bird abundance, which lessens the influence of the most abundant species (Latja et al 2016). We visually assessed our data for normality and homoscedasticity in R. We calculated marginal and conditional R² values for each of our models using rsquared in R package "piecewiseSEM" (Table 1; Lefcheck 2016), and pvalues using R package "lmerTest" (Kuznetova et al 2017).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested the hypothesis that bird communities change with the successional state of the forest (Catterall et al 2012, Frishkoff andKarp 2019). We predicted that as forests increase in maturity and complexity, bird species diversity and bird abundance would change to resemble diversity and abundance features found in primary forests (Latja et al 2016). We also predicted that different assemblages of birds would exist in forests of different ages, and that these assemblages would continue to become more similar to those found in primary forests over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we classified all bird species recorded in our surveys into two ecological guilds representing their dependence on undisturbed forest conditions, based on the Birds of the World database (Billerman et al, 2020): (1) forest-dependent species – species that prefer primary or mature secondary forests; and (2) generalist species – species that are able to survive in or prefer heavily degraded natural forests, plantations, open areas, or human-dominated landscapes. Compared with generalist species, we expected that the abundance of forest-dependent species would increase more markedly over time as the forest condition improved under restoration (Latja et al, 2016; Owen et al, 2020). Finally, for all bird species recorded in our surveys, we recorded their current IUCN Red List categories, along with descriptions of the threats they face (IUCN, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birds are good indicators of environmental changes and serve to evaluate the recovery of biodiversity in habitat restoration (Latja et al ), mainly because the composition of bird assemblages may change according to the vegetation successional stage (Munro et al ; Batisteli et al ). Birds are the focal taxa in less than 10% of restoration studies, which usually deal with plants (Brudvig ; Kollmann et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%