Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs) are key reference materials
for the validation and parameterization of computationally cost-effective
procedures such as density functional theory (DFT), semiempirical
molecular orbital theory, and molecular mechanics. We obtain accurate
heats of formation (ΔH
f,298) for
20 PAHs with up to 18 carbon atoms by means of the explicitly correlated
W1-F12 thermochemical procedure. The heats of formation are obtained
via atomization reactions and quasi-isodesmic reactions involving
CH4, C2H4, and C6H6 for which accurate experimental ΔH
f,298 values are available from the active thermochemical
tables (ATcT) network. We show that for large PAHs, the differences
between W1-F12 heats of formation obtained from atomization and quasi-isodesmic
reactions increase with the size of the system and range between 1.7
(C7H8) and 8.9 (chrysene, C18H12) kJ mol–1. This suggests that atomization
reactions should be used with caution for obtaining heats of formation
for medium-sized systems even when highly accurate thermochemical
procedures (such as W1-F12 theory) are used. For eight PAH compounds
(toluene, indene, acenaphthylene, biphenyl, diphenylmethane, anthracene,
pyrene, and chrysene), our best theoretical values agree with the
best experimental values to within ∼1 kJ mol–1; for six additional systems (indane, naphthalene, biphenylene, acenaphthene,
phenanthrene, and m-terphenyl), the agreement between
theory and experiment is good with deviations ranging between 2 and
4 kJ mol–1. However, for four systems (p-terphenyl, fluorene, pyracene, and pyracyclene), our best W1-F12
values suggest that the experimental ΔH
f,298 values should be revised by significant amounts ranging
from 6.5 and 24.4 kJ mol–1.