2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active vibration control of Flexible Joint Manipulator using Input Shaping and Adaptive Parameter Auto Disturbance Rejection Controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, some application fields, such as aerospace and precision manufacturing, put forward lower energy consumption and higher reliability requirements for the manipulator operation performance 1‐3 . Compared with traditional rigid‐joint manipulators, manipulators with flexible (material) joints show better performance in these fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, some application fields, such as aerospace and precision manufacturing, put forward lower energy consumption and higher reliability requirements for the manipulator operation performance 1‐3 . Compared with traditional rigid‐joint manipulators, manipulators with flexible (material) joints show better performance in these fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During past few decades, some methods of the active vibration suppression for FJMs have been greatly developed. To realize position control of an FJM, some strategies, such as PD control with gravity compensation, 8 adaptive input shaping method 1 and optimal control approach 9 are presented. To realize the tracking control of an FJM, Luca and Book 10 proposed a static feedback linearization (FL) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes delays in the precise positioning of the end effector. For example, approximately a third of the time spent in the operation of the remote manipulator system of the space shuttle is used to wait for vibrations to decay to negligible values [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally known that a servo system contains unknown nonlinear functions, that is, geometric and physical parameter deviations, model uncertainties, unmeasured states and external disturbance, which are modeled as loss of effectiveness. In order to solve the problem of model uncertainty and external disturbance of a flexible joint, adaptive control strategy , higher‐order differential feedback control , adaptive sliding mode control , and a robust H ∞ control have been applied. Chang investigated a robust tracking controller for uncertain flexible‐joint robots with time delays and time‐varying perturbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%