2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2007
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2007.383363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Active Visual Object Reconstruction using D-, E-, and T-Optimal Next Best Views

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous pipeline has become a standard for Multi-view Stereo Reconstruction, and it was implemented in several versions, both structured as webservices or closed systems, where the user must provide all the images which were acquired, and the interaction is limited to the possibility to tune the parameters of the various steps of the reconstruction. Some attempts have been done to break this paradigm, by proposing methods to assist the user during the acquisition, essentially by estimating a set of missing view to be suggested to the user [16], [17], [18]. Our approach differentiates from the latter because there is no assumption on the object shape and the acquisition setup, and the object of interest and the suggested view(s) are generated only by analyzing the sparse reconstruction of the scene.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous pipeline has become a standard for Multi-view Stereo Reconstruction, and it was implemented in several versions, both structured as webservices or closed systems, where the user must provide all the images which were acquired, and the interaction is limited to the possibility to tune the parameters of the various steps of the reconstruction. Some attempts have been done to break this paradigm, by proposing methods to assist the user during the acquisition, essentially by estimating a set of missing view to be suggested to the user [16], [17], [18]. Our approach differentiates from the latter because there is no assumption on the object shape and the acquisition setup, and the object of interest and the suggested view(s) are generated only by analyzing the sparse reconstruction of the scene.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As input data we use predefined image sequences as well as a planned sequence produced by the information-theoretic NBV planning approach described in [5]. Figure 2 shows the experimental setup.…”
Section: Experimental Comparison Of Klt Gklt and Gklt 3d Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NBV planning uses these additional possibilities to achieve defined reconstruction goals. The NBV planning method in [5] uses an extended Kalman filter to compute 3D reconstructions of tracked features and determines the next best view by applying an information-theoretic quality criterion and visibility constraints. We track 496 features and use the short test sequence as the initial sequence of the planning procedure.…”
Section: Comparison Within An Information-theoretic Approach For Nextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, scanning and registration in this case highly depends on having the human body shape as a prior. Some NBV techniques [Wenhardt et al 2007;Dunn and Frahm 2009] build 3D models from images, based on camera movements and on utilizing the model's covariance structure as well as texture appearance. In our work, we instead aim at high fidelity 3D scanning of unknown objects that allow automatic reconstruction of objects with rich geometric details and a complex topology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%