Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3290605.3300272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ActiveInk

Abstract: During sensemaking, people annotate insights: underlining sentences in a document or circling regions on a map. They jot down their hypotheses: drawing correlation lines on scatterplots or creating personal legends to track patterns. We present ActiveInk, a system enabling people to seamlessly transition between exploring data and externalizing their thoughts using pen and touch. ActiveInk enables the natural use of pen for active reading behaviors, while supporting analytic actions by activating any of these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in these fields are typically concerned with evaluating either visualizations (e.g., design decisions) or their underlying processes (e.g., user experience) (Lam et al, 2012). A common finding speaks to how specific features of a tool or visualization may affect or augment resulting interpretations (Larkin & Simon, 1987;Scaife & Rogers, 1996;Grammel, Tory, & Storey, 2010;Romat et al, 2019;Yi, Kang, Stasko, & Jacko, 2007). However, studies that delve into the nuanced practices that educators undertake when making sense of learning data are only beginning to emerge in the HCI and InfoVis fields.…”
Section: Expanding the Notion Of Sensemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in these fields are typically concerned with evaluating either visualizations (e.g., design decisions) or their underlying processes (e.g., user experience) (Lam et al, 2012). A common finding speaks to how specific features of a tool or visualization may affect or augment resulting interpretations (Larkin & Simon, 1987;Scaife & Rogers, 1996;Grammel, Tory, & Storey, 2010;Romat et al, 2019;Yi, Kang, Stasko, & Jacko, 2007). However, studies that delve into the nuanced practices that educators undertake when making sense of learning data are only beginning to emerge in the HCI and InfoVis fields.…”
Section: Expanding the Notion Of Sensemakingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the interaction itself, interactive surfaces such as tablets or digital whiteboards are interesting environments for editing. Specifically, the additional input modalities of these environments, e.g., touch [33,64], pen [20,63], or speech [70], can potentially simplify edit operations and improve precision at lower LoDs. For example, in order to update an attribute value, the new value could simply be spoken, written with a pen, or indicated by "slicing" a bar at a certain height via touch.…”
Section: Facets Of Responsivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, digital twins have the potential to visualise data associated with a design in a spatially bound manner [14,51], which is particularly suited for the visually oriented practices of many designers. Meanwhile sense-making around visualised data can be supported by annotation [40,59] and collaborative data exploration [31].…”
Section: Developing Data-driven Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%