2016
DOI: 10.1080/10852352.2016.1166809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Actively caring to prevent bullying in an elementary school: Prompting and rewarding prosocial behavior

Abstract: This field study evaluated the impact of an intervention designed to prevent bullying among elementary-school students by prompting and rewarding prosocial behavior. More specifically, teachers of 404 second-, third-, fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-grade students from an elementary school in northeast Virginia asked their students to look out for other students' prosocial behaviors (termed "actively caring") and to submit their stories about actively caring. At the start of every class day, the teachers read three… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting alternative is to promote and reward prosocial behaviours. Specifically, McCarty, Teie, McCutchen, and Geller (2016) found that prompting and reinforcing caring behaviour over a 6-week intervention not only reduced bullying but also increased the self-worth of upper level elementary students (i.e., Grades 3-6) as a positive side-effect. Provided that engagement in prosocial behaviour has been positively associated with peer acceptance (Layous, Nelson, Oberle, Schonert-Reichl, & Lyubomirsky, 2012), promoting prosocial behaviours might be a promising approach to reduce bullying by increasing self-worth, establishing friendship and lowering competitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An interesting alternative is to promote and reward prosocial behaviours. Specifically, McCarty, Teie, McCutchen, and Geller (2016) found that prompting and reinforcing caring behaviour over a 6-week intervention not only reduced bullying but also increased the self-worth of upper level elementary students (i.e., Grades 3-6) as a positive side-effect. Provided that engagement in prosocial behaviour has been positively associated with peer acceptance (Layous, Nelson, Oberle, Schonert-Reichl, & Lyubomirsky, 2012), promoting prosocial behaviours might be a promising approach to reduce bullying by increasing self-worth, establishing friendship and lowering competitions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Evidence from 63 countries revealed that collectivistic countries have higher empathy than individualistic countries and that country-level empathy was positively associated with country-level prosocial behaviors, agreeableness, conscientiousness, self-esteem, and subjective well-being (Chopik, Brien, & Konrath, 2017). Therefore, as these country-level variables may buffer the negative effects of bullying (McCarty, Teie, McCutchen, & Geller, 2016; Pfetsch, 2017; Plopa, Plopa, & Skuzinska, 2017), this may explain the different effect sizes between Europe and North America. Contrary to the result of the current meta-analysis, Peluchette, Karl, Wood, and Williams (2015) found that young Australian adults were significantly more likely to engage in risky social networking practices and experience both mild and harsh forms of cyberbullying than the U.S. participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptive mal behavior that appears can be reduced by strengthening prosocial behavior (Barón et al, 2018). Prosocial behavior can prevent bullying or other aggressive behavior among elementary school students (Grossman et al, 1997;McCarty et al, 2016). Strengthening and character building, especially prosocial behavior, should ideally be carried out since elementary school age (Chandler, 2006;Muslihati, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%