2017 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/ehb.2017.7995502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activities of daily living and falls recognition and classification from the wearable sensors data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ADL and fall recognition classifier model training we used several machine learning algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM) with both linear kernel and radial basis function (RBF) kernel, Random Forest Classifier (RF), Decision Tree Classifier (DT), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), Adaptive Boosting Classifier (AB) and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) algorithm with k=5. Some of these methods were selected based on results achieved by Ivascu, Cincar, Dinis and Negru implementing the same machine learning algorithms, although using different features [5]. The datasets were divided into training data (70% for the PIV dataset, and 75% for UniZg activ2 dataset) and testing data (30% for the PIV dataset, and 25% for UniZg activ2 dataset).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ADL and fall recognition classifier model training we used several machine learning algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM) with both linear kernel and radial basis function (RBF) kernel, Random Forest Classifier (RF), Decision Tree Classifier (DT), Gaussian Naïve Bayes (GNB), Adaptive Boosting Classifier (AB) and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) algorithm with k=5. Some of these methods were selected based on results achieved by Ivascu, Cincar, Dinis and Negru implementing the same machine learning algorithms, although using different features [5]. The datasets were divided into training data (70% for the PIV dataset, and 75% for UniZg activ2 dataset) and testing data (30% for the PIV dataset, and 25% for UniZg activ2 dataset).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In medicine, predictive data analytics is a crucial challenge to improve the diagnosis and the monitoring of patients. Machine learning for predictive data analytics in medicine is now used in many fields: oncology (Adegoke et al., 2017; Ammad‐Ud‐Din et al., 2017; Armero et al., 2016; Borisov et al., 2017; Coley et al., 2017; Hoogendoorn et al., 2016; Kim & Cho, 2015; Nagarajan & Upreti, 2017; Schwartzi et al., 2015), neurology (Ertuğrul et al., 2016; Jeon et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2015; Kramer et al., 2017; Tripoliti et al., 2013; Xia et al., 2015; Yuvaraj et al., 2014), geriatric (Deschamps et al., 2016; Fabris et al., 2016; Ivascu et al., 2017; Kabeshova et al., 2016); Wan et al., 2015), epidemiology (Khanna & Sharma, 2018; Modu et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2016), pharmacology (Bakal et al., 2018; Bendtsen et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2017; Luo et al., 2015; Oztaner et al., 2015), … (Alghamdi et al., 2016; Delibašić et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2017; Jarmulski et al., 2018; Jing et al., 2016; Montoye et al., 2017; Oztekin et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2017; Sanz et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefiting from mobile applications and largescale data, technologies such as Blue Button (website of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, n.d.) and IBM Watson (IBM Watson, n.d.) help track treatment progress and reduce wrong diagnoses. In healthcare, AI covers a wide range of applications, including screening (Lin, Chang, Lin, Tsai, & Chen, 2017), monitoring (Ivascu, Cincar, & Negru, 2017), and diagnosis (Islam Chowdhuryy, Sultana, Ghosh, Ahamed, & Mahmood, 2018). Of the applied AI methods, deep learning techniques (Gharehbaghi & Lindén, 2017;Loh & Then, 2017) seem to be more adaptable, accurate, and robust in a wide range of applications and biological signals, such as lung sound classification (Chen, Zhang, Tian, Zhang, Chen, & Lei, 2016), cardiac auscultation (Amiriparian, Schmitt, M., Cummins, N., Qian, K., Dong, F., & Schuller, 2018), phonocardiography (Thomae & a https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6805-166X b https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1819-6200 Dominik, 2016), and vital sign evaluation (Jones, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%