2000
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-40911-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity Graphs and Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar work has been undertaken by others (see e.g., [NB02,BD00]) by integrating parts of UML and CSP. Although the integration step is different, the motivation is quite similar: CSP serves as formal semantics to a non-formal graphical notation, and the graphical notation provides a user-friendly front-end for CSP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Similar work has been undertaken by others (see e.g., [NB02,BD00]) by integrating parts of UML and CSP. Although the integration step is different, the motivation is quite similar: CSP serves as formal semantics to a non-formal graphical notation, and the graphical notation provides a user-friendly front-end for CSP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A branching activity model is a tree or graph (Bolton and Davies 2000) where nodes are activities (also known as routines, business processes, or projects) and the edges represent an existential causal relationship between activities: e.g. A 2 is initiated-by…”
Section: Branching Activity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E.g., the research by Börger et al [BCR00c] defines a semantics by translating activity diagrams to abstract state machines. Bolton and Davies [BoD00] provide a formalization of activity diagrams using CSP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%