Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Langua 2016
DOI: 10.18653/v1/n16-1171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity Modeling in Email

Abstract: We introduce a latent activity model for workplace emails, positing that communication at work is purposeful and organized by activities. We pose the problem as probabilistic inference in graphical models that jointly capture the interplay between latent activities and the email contexts they govern, such as the recipients, subject and body. The model parameters are learned using maximum likelihood estimation with an expectation maximization algorithm. We present three variants of the model that incorporate th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling Actions on Email. Our work is related to previous research on user behavior and email action modeling [10,11,20,23,24,28]. Dabbish et al [10] examined people's ratings of message importance and the actions they took on speci c email messages with a survey of 121 people at a university.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Modeling Actions on Email. Our work is related to previous research on user behavior and email action modeling [10,11,20,23,24,28]. Dabbish et al [10] examined people's ratings of message importance and the actions they took on speci c email messages with a survey of 121 people at a university.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Researchers have used machine learning methods to improve email efficiency by predicting email responses. Previous work includes predicting email importance and ranking by likelihood of user action (Aberdeen et al, 2010), classifying emails into common actions -read, reply, delete, and delete-WithoutRead (Di Castro et al, 2016), and characterizing response behavior based on various factors Kooti et al, 2015;Qadir et al, 2016) including time, length, and conversion, temporal, textual properties, and historical interactions. Our work differs from previous studies by considering both semantic and structural information in email response prediction and developing an interpretable model.…”
Section: Email Response Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carvalho and Cohen [12] classify emails according to their speech acts. Graus et al [20], Qadir et al [45] recommend recipients to send an email message to. Kannan et al [28] propose an end-to-end method for automatically generating email responses that can be sent by the user with a single click.…”
Section: Predictive Models For Emailmentioning
confidence: 99%