Determinants of working capacity vary with the task to be performed, cultural differences in the distinction between work and leisure, and secular trends to a sedentary society. However, tolerance of physical effort is still necessary in many developing countries. Determinatians of working capacity should examine at least aerobic power, body composition, physical performance, and muscular endurance. Often, compromises will be necessary when testing in remote locations, but where possible, normal laboratory procedures should be followed. Data must be interpreted in relation to size, nutrition, fluid balance, lifestyle (including current activity habits and cigarette consumption), family size, and general health. The range of human variation can be examined by several techniques, including data distribution curves for large populations, the study of extreme variants such as athletes and patients with metabolic abnormalities, and comparisons between close relatives. To date, population studies have failed to unravel the relative contribution of constitution and environment to the determination of physical working capacity. The way ahead probably lies in more extended studies of relatives, sustained over several generations.In recent years, physical anthropologists have added to their basic repertoire of static measurements a range of dynamic observations, including data on human working capacity. It has been suggested that the ability to colonize a n unpromising habitat may depend more upon these dynamic characteristics than upon static dimensions. In the present paper, the physiological determinants of human working capacity are considered, discussing in particular methods of data collection which are appropriate to field situations. Given the excellent review of Bouchard et al. (1981) and several other fairly recent publications (Shephard, 1480; 1982a ,b; Andersen et al., 1978;Harris, 1982), a systematic treatment of such topics as the growth, aging, and training of working capacity would be superfluous. Rather, factors modifying the observed characteristics of any given community (such as body size, nutrition, lifestyle, family size, and health status) are emphasized. Comment will be offered on the potential for exploring human variation through comparisons between athletes and sedentary individuals, studies of twins and close relatives, and an examination of inherited abnormalities of working capacity. Comparisons between populations colonizing extreme habitats, ethnic comparisons within a given habitat, and studies of migrants will be exploited to examine the range of human adaptability. Finally, a brief critique will be made of both the findings and the underlying philosophy of these several approaches to the variance of populations.
DETERMINANTS OF WORKING CAPACITY
Nature of workOne immediate handicap when attempting to measure the working capacity of any human population is a lack of agreement on the nature of "work." The debate 0 1985 Alan R. Liss, Inc.