2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2011.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity recognition using eye-gaze movements and traditional interactions

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe need for intelligent HCI has been reinforced by the increasing numbers of human-centered applications in our daily life. However, in order to respond adequately, intelligent applications must first interpret users' actions. Identifying the context in which users' interactions occur is an important step toward automatic interpretation of behavior. In order to address a part of this context-sensing problem, we propose a generic and application-independent framework for activity recognition of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This research has typically focused on either identifying differences in gaze patterns for different visualizations [12], task types [17,26], and activities within a task [4], or on explaining differences in user accuracy between alternative visualization interfaces [22]. While these studies provide valuable insights on how different tasks and/or activities affect a user's gaze behaviors, they have traditionally ignored individual differences among study participants.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This research has typically focused on either identifying differences in gaze patterns for different visualizations [12], task types [17,26], and activities within a task [4], or on explaining differences in user accuracy between alternative visualization interfaces [22]. While these studies provide valuable insights on how different tasks and/or activities affect a user's gaze behaviors, they have traditionally ignored individual differences among study participants.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to analyze eye tracking data is to apply data mining techniques, such as Hidden Markov Models [4], Scan-Path clustering [11], or specifically defined unsupervised algorithms [5,16]. While data mining methods can quickly identify clusters of similar attention patterns during visualization tasks, the results they return are often difficult to interpret, since unsupervised algorithms are typically applied as black-boxes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have been achieved for modeling and analysis of user's behavior during interaction with an online learning application using two of the most popular probabilistic graphical models: HMM and CRF. Courtemanche et al [27] used HMM approach to recognize the activity of learner within an e-learning platform based on mouse cursor interactions. In [28], HMM have been used for segmenting and labeling mouse trajectory into behavior acts such as cleaning, stopping and searching.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first notable example is by Courtemanche et al (2011) who claim their approach to activity recognition to be the first one to incorporate eye movements. This work utilizes eye movements discretized in terms of interfacespecific AOIs in addition to keystrokes and mouse clicks input by the user during interaction.…”
Section: Virtual Task Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%