2010
DOI: 10.3233/ais-2010-0071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Activity recognition using temporal evidence theory

Abstract: The ability to identify the behavior of people in a home is at the core of Smart Home functionality. Such environments are equipped with sensors that unobtrusively capture information about the occupants. Reasoning mechanisms transform the technical, frequently noisy data of sensors into meaningful interpretations of occupant activities. Time is a natural human way to reason place at distinct times throughout the day and last for predicable lengths of time. However, the inclusion of temporal information is sti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to other uncertainty reasoning frameworks such as fuzzy logic [58], DST has the advantage of preserving uncertainty levels from each evidence channel and providing a boundary for the certainty levels of the final belief [59]. Due to DST's wide applicability, it has been used for decision fusion in visual tracking [60], human activity recognition [61] and robot localization [62], to mention a few examples.…”
Section: Early Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other uncertainty reasoning frameworks such as fuzzy logic [58], DST has the advantage of preserving uncertainty levels from each evidence channel and providing a boundary for the certainty levels of the final belief [59]. Due to DST's wide applicability, it has been used for decision fusion in visual tracking [60], human activity recognition [61] and robot localization [62], to mention a few examples.…”
Section: Early Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, dynamic sliding window methods enable varying sizes of sliding windows at runtime based on di erent features, such as the duration of activities [29,33,41], change of sensor states [24], or change of location context of consecutive sensor data [16]. Krishnan et al [23] explore both static and dynamic sliding window approaches, with the incorporation of the time decay and mutual information of sensor events within a window; e.g., the occurrence ratio of two sensors occurring consecutively in the entire sensor stream.…”
Section: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrid (Riboni and Bettini, 2011a;Roy et al, 2011;Augusto et al, 2008) Markov Logic Networks (Helaoui et al, 2011;Skarlatidis et al, 2011) Evidence Theory (McKeever et al, 2010;Sebbak et al, 2012;Hong et al, 2009) Constraint-based reasoning (Pecora et al, 2012;Cirillo et al, 2009) Can handle quantitative and qualitative uncertainty…”
Section: Yes Very Limited Yesmentioning
confidence: 99%