“…To win more votes, opposition parties need to persuade voters, not only that they perform well, but that they will be better than, or different from, the current government. In this context, opposing the government in plenary votes sends a signal to the electorate, highlighting the difference between a given opposing party and the government (Russell et al., 2017). My hypotheses relies on the latter rationale; I argue that the better a party is poised to compete for office in the upcoming elections, the more likely it is to prefer conflict with the government over cooperation with it.…”
Section: Theoretical Overview and Research Hypothesesmentioning
This article explains the variation in opposition behavior by investigating parliamentary voting of opposition parties across 16 European national parliaments. It finds that features of an opposition party that increase its likelihood of winning office in future elections—its size and experience in government—increase the party’s tendency toward confrontation with the government, as do features that increase the party’s need to differentiate itself from the government. At the systemic level, features that increase the attractiveness of cooperation—such as an open structure of competition and considerable influence of the opposition on parliamentary decision-making—decrease tendencies toward confrontation. Together, party-specific and systemic features explain two-thirds of the observed variation in the behavior of opposition parties, even without controlling for vote-specific factors.
“…To win more votes, opposition parties need to persuade voters, not only that they perform well, but that they will be better than, or different from, the current government. In this context, opposing the government in plenary votes sends a signal to the electorate, highlighting the difference between a given opposing party and the government (Russell et al., 2017). My hypotheses relies on the latter rationale; I argue that the better a party is poised to compete for office in the upcoming elections, the more likely it is to prefer conflict with the government over cooperation with it.…”
Section: Theoretical Overview and Research Hypothesesmentioning
This article explains the variation in opposition behavior by investigating parliamentary voting of opposition parties across 16 European national parliaments. It finds that features of an opposition party that increase its likelihood of winning office in future elections—its size and experience in government—increase the party’s tendency toward confrontation with the government, as do features that increase the party’s need to differentiate itself from the government. At the systemic level, features that increase the attractiveness of cooperation—such as an open structure of competition and considerable influence of the opposition on parliamentary decision-making—decrease tendencies toward confrontation. Together, party-specific and systemic features explain two-thirds of the observed variation in the behavior of opposition parties, even without controlling for vote-specific factors.
“…Our study went further, tracking all 4,361 amendments proposed to 12 bills at every stage of the legislative process (Russell, Gover, and Wollter forthcoming; Russell et al forthcoming). It is notable that the bills were subject to relatively few Commons rebellions or Lords defeats.…”
Section: Bill Amendments and The Legislative Processmentioning
“…Parliament, therefore, controls government actions through policy and financial scrutiny. Russell et al, (2017) argue that UK parliament is credible institution and its influence is significant felt globally where all institutions of the House are operational. Nogoibaeva (2014) are public policy formulation is an uphill task in many developing democracies.…”
Section: Independence Of Parliament and Public Policy Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Franchino & Hyland (2009) argue that in developing democracies, there is an overlap of roles between the legislature and executive branches of government. According toRussell et al, (2017), the Executive initiates policies proposals to parliament for debate, scrutiny and final approval. Parliament listens to policy proposals tendered in by different stakeholders during agenda setting.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.